Which of the following statements about emergency safety information (kinkyu anzensei joho) is correct?
It is often information transmitted about a prescription pharmaceutical, and emergency safety information related to an over-the-counter medicine or a kampo formula preparation has never once been issued and is never a subject of it.
Information transmission is limited to direct distribution from the manufacturing and marketing business operator to medical institutions, pharmacies, and the like, and information is never provided through press releases, the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Information Distribution Service (PMDA Medi-navi), direct mail, fax, email, or the like.
It is prepared, based on an order or instruction from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, or on the voluntary decision of the manufacturing and marketing business operator, when a situation exists requiring measures for urgent and serious attention-calling or use restriction concerning a pharmaceutical, medical device, or regenerative medicine product.
It is an A4-size printed document on a blue background, also called a "blue letter," prepared when urgent and serious attention needs to be called for.
AnswerC. It is prepared, based on an order or instruction from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, or on the voluntary decision of the manufacturing and marketing business operator, when a situation exists requiring measures for urgent and serious attention-calling or use restriction concerning a pharmaceutical, medical device, or regenerative medicine product.
Emergency safety information is prepared, based on an order or instruction from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, or on the voluntary decision of the manufacturing and marketing business operator, when urgent and serious attention-calling is needed. It is an A4-size printed document on a yellow background, called a "yellow letter" (a blue-background document is a safety-update communication, or "blue letter"). Information related to over-the-counter medicines has also been issued, such as the emergency safety information on interstitial pneumonia caused by Sho-saiko-to (March 1996), and transmission is by press release, PMDA Medi-navi, direct distribution, direct mail, fax, email, and the like.
Q2 | Safety-Update Communication
Which of the following statements about a safety-update communication (anzensei sokuho) is correct?
It is an A4-size printed document on a yellow background, also called a "yellow letter."
It is an A4-size printed document on a blue background, also called a "blue letter."
It is prepared when a situation exists requiring measures for urgent and serious attention-calling or use restriction.
It is prepared based on an order or instruction from the prefectural governor.
AnswerB. It is an A4-size printed document on a blue background, also called a "blue letter."
A safety-update communication is an A4-size printed document on a blue background, also called a "blue letter." It is prepared, based on an order or instruction from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, or on the voluntary decision of the manufacturing and marketing business operator, in a situation requiring more prompt attention-calling or measures for appropriate use than an ordinary revision of the precautions for use. A yellow-background document is emergency safety information, and it is also emergency safety information that is prepared "when a situation exists requiring measures for urgent and serious attention-calling or use restriction." The prefectural governor is not the basis for its preparation.
Q3 | Distinguishing the Letters
Which of the following statements about emergency safety information and a safety-update communication is incorrect?
A safety-update communication is prepared when a situation exists requiring more prompt attention-calling, among other things, concerning a pharmaceutical, medical device, or regenerative medicine product, than an ordinary revision of the precautions for use.
Emergency safety information is transmitted by direct distribution from the manufacturing and marketing business operator to medical institutions, pharmacies, and the like, and by information provision (within one month) through direct mail, fax, email, and the like.
A safety-update communication is an A4-size printed document on a yellow background.
Emergency safety information is also called a "yellow letter."
AnswerC. A safety-update communication is an A4-size printed document on a yellow background.
A safety-update communication is an A4-size printed document on a blue background (a "blue letter"), while the yellow-background document (a "yellow letter") is emergency safety information. Swapping these colors is a classic incorrect option. The other three statements are correct as stated in the Guide; both emergency safety information and a safety-update communication are transmitted within one month by direct distribution, direct mail, email, and the like.
Q4 | A Real Example of Emergency Information
Which of the following statements about the subject and information provision of emergency safety information is correct?
The preparation of emergency safety information is limited to cases based on an order or instruction from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, and is never prepared based on the voluntary decision of the manufacturing and marketing business operator.
The deadline for information provision is set at within one year.
Emergency safety information is prepared covering only prescription pharmaceuticals.
Emergency safety information related to an over-the-counter medicine has also been issued, such as the emergency safety information on interstitial pneumonia caused by Sho-saiko-to (March 1996).
AnswerD. Emergency safety information related to an over-the-counter medicine has also been issued, such as the emergency safety information on interstitial pneumonia caused by Sho-saiko-to (March 1996).
Emergency safety information is often information transmitted about a prescription pharmaceutical or a medical device for professional use, but information related to an over-the-counter medicine has also been issued, such as the emergency safety information on interstitial pneumonia caused by Sho-saiko-to (March 1996). It does not cover only prescription pharmaceuticals. Information provision is within one month, and it is prepared based on an order or instruction from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, or on the voluntary decision of the manufacturing and marketing business operator, among other bases.
Q5 | Safety Information
Which of the following statements about the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Safety Information bulletin is correct?
The Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency compiles the information and provides it widely to medical professionals and members of the general public.
It is issued as a public relations bulletin for members of the general public, not for medical professionals, and is not widely provided to medical professionals.
Its content includes explanatory articles on pharmaceutical safety, the content of revisions to precautions for use, the main target products, reference materials, and the like.
The pharmaceuticals covered include only prescription pharmaceuticals, and not over-the-counter medicines.
AnswerC. Its content includes explanatory articles on pharmaceutical safety, the content of revisions to precautions for use, the main target products, reference materials, and the like.
The Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Safety Information bulletin carries explanatory articles on pharmaceutical safety, the content of revisions to precautions for use, the main target products, reference materials (and, for a revision concerning an important side effect, an outline of the case reports that formed the basis), and the like. It is the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, not the Agency, that compiles and provides this information, and its subjects include pharmaceuticals (including over-the-counter medicines) and medical devices, and it is provided widely to medical professionals.
Q6 | The Agency's Website
Which of the following statements about information posted on the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency's website is incorrect?
Case information regarding a suspected side effect from a pharmaceutical, reported by a manufacturing and marketing business operator or a medical institution, is not posted.
Information on the recall of pharmaceutical products, among others, is posted.
Approval information for pharmaceuticals is posted.
Emergency safety information instructed by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare to manufacturing and marketing business operators, and information on revisions to "precautions for use," are posted.
AnswerA. Case information regarding a suspected side effect from a pharmaceutical, reported by a manufacturing and marketing business operator or a medical institution, is not posted.
Case information regarding a suspected side effect from a pharmaceutical, reported by a manufacturing and marketing business operator or a medical institution, is also posted on the Agency's website. In addition, package insert information, the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Safety Information bulletin, emergency safety information, revision information for "precautions for use," pharmaceutical approval information, product recall information, package insert information for over-the-counter and designated-guidance-required pharmaceuticals, and materials announced by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare on pharmaceutical safety, are all posted, so the other three options are correct.
Q7 | Medi-Navi
Which of the following statements about the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Information Distribution Service (PMDA Medi-navi) is correct?
For particularly important information concerning safety, it is a service that, in addition to being posted on the website, is delivered in a timely manner by postal mail rather than email.
It is a service that, when particularly important information concerning the safety of a pharmaceutical or medical device is issued, delivers that information in a timely manner by email.
It is a service run by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, and the Agency is not involved.
Its use is limited to medical professionals, such as a pharmacist or registered seller employed by a pharmacy owner or store-based retailer, and a member of the general public cannot use it.
AnswerB. It is a service that, when particularly important information concerning the safety of a pharmaceutical or medical device is issued, delivers that information in a timely manner by email.
PMDA Medi-navi is a service run by the Agency that, when particularly important information concerning the safety of a pharmaceutical or medical device is issued, posts it on the website and also delivers that information in a timely manner by email. Anyone can use it, and it is not limited to medical professionals. Delivery is by email, not postal mail, and the operating body is the Agency, not the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare.
Q8 | Duty of Effort to Provide Information
Which of the following statements about pharmaceutical safety information is incorrect?
The Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Safety Information bulletin does not introduce an outline of the case reports that formed the basis for a revision concerning an important side effect.
The Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Safety Information bulletin is posted on the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare's website and the Agency's website.
A pharmaceutical's manufacturing and marketing business operator, among others, must collect and examine matters concerning the pharmaceutical's efficacy and safety and other information necessary for its appropriate use, and must endeavor to provide it to a pharmacy owner, store-based retailer, home-delivery retailer, and the pharmacists and registered sellers engaged there.
The Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Safety Information bulletin is sent to each prefecture, each city establishing a health center and special ward, related academic societies, medical institutions, and the like.
AnswerA. The Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Safety Information bulletin does not introduce an outline of the case reports that formed the basis for a revision concerning an important side effect.
The Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Safety Information bulletin carries reference materials, and for a revision concerning an important side effect, an outline of the case reports that formed the basis is also introduced. The duty of effort for a manufacturing and marketing business operator to collect and provide information (Article 68-2-6, Paragraph 1 of the Act), its posting on the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare's website and the Agency's website, and its distribution to prefectures, cities establishing health centers, special wards, and related academic societies, are all correct as stated in the Guide.
Q9 | Reporting System
Which of the following statements about the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Safety Information Reporting System is correct?
The reporting deadline is set at within 15 days from the day on which the occurrence of health harm suspected of being caused by a pharmaceutical's side effect, among other things, became known.
When a medical professional learns of the occurrence of health harm suspected of being caused by a pharmaceutical's side effect, among other things, and finds it necessary to prevent the occurrence or spread of harm to public health and hygiene, that professional must report that fact to the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare.
In practice, the report is submitted not to the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency but to the prefectural governor of the reporter's location.
Even after the introduction of the registered seller system under the June 2006 amendment of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act, a registered seller is not included among the medical professionals who report under this system, and only a pharmacist, physician, or dentist may report.
AnswerB. When a medical professional learns of the occurrence of health harm suspected of being caused by a pharmaceutical's side effect, among other things, and finds it necessary to prevent the occurrence or spread of harm to public health and hygiene, that professional must report that fact to the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare.
Under Article 68-10, Paragraph 2 of the Act, a medical professional who learns of the occurrence of health harm suspected of being caused by a side effect or the like, and who finds it necessary to prevent the occurrence or spread of harm to public health and hygiene, must report that fact to the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare. With the introduction of the registered seller system under the June 2006 amendment of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act, a registered seller has also come to be positioned as a medical professional who reports. No particular reporting deadline is set, and in practice the report is submitted to the Agency.
Q10 | How to Report
Which of the following statements about a report based on the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Safety Information Reporting System is incorrect?
It is not necessary to fill in every field of the report form; it is sufficient to report to the extent information can be obtained from the purchaser, among others.
Even when the causal relationship with the pharmaceutical is not necessarily clear, it can still be a subject of reporting.
Even when multiple professionals are involved in the sale, among other activities, of the pharmaceutical, it is sufficient for a report to be submitted by the one professional who had direct contact with the health harm information.
The reporting deadline is set at within 30 days from the day on which the occurrence of the health harm became known.
AnswerD. The reporting deadline is set at within 30 days from the day on which the occurrence of the health harm became known.
No particular reporting deadline is set for this system. From the standpoint of preventing the occurrence or spread of harm to public health and hygiene, when the need for a report is recognized, the report is to be sent promptly, as appropriate, to the Agency by postal mail, fax, or email. A deadline such as within 30 days applies to a report on side effects, among other things, from a company (a manufacturing and marketing business operator or the like). The other three options are correct as stated in the Guide.
Q11 | History of the System
Which of the following statements about the history of the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Safety Information Reporting System is correct?
Reporting of side effects, among other things, by a medical professional such as a physician or pharmacist was made mandatory by the June 2006 amendment of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act.
From August 1978, regular reports began to be made on cases of over-the-counter medicine side effects, among other things, identified at about 3,000 monitoring hospitals.
This system started in March 1967 as the "Drug Side Effect Monitor System," in which about 3,000 medical institutions were designated as monitoring facilities and the then Ministry of Health and Welfare received side-effect reports directly.
A registered seller is not positioned as a medical professional who reports under this system.
AnswerC. This system started in March 1967 as the "Drug Side Effect Monitor System," in which about 3,000 medical institutions were designated as monitoring facilities and the then Ministry of Health and Welfare received side-effect reports directly.
This system started in March 1967 as the "Drug Side Effect Monitor System," in which about 3,000 medical institutions were designated as monitoring facilities. Mandatory reporting by a medical professional was introduced by the July 2002 amendment of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act, while the June 2006 amendment introduced the registered seller system, under which a registered seller also came to be positioned as a reporting medical professional. It was about 3,000 monitoring pharmacies, not monitoring hospitals, that began regular reporting from August 1978.
Q12 | Method of Reporting
Which of the following statements about how to report a suspected side effect of a pharmaceutical is correct?
A report can only be made using information obtained from the person who suffered the health harm.
Health harm believed to be caused by overdose or misuse of a pharmaceutical is never a subject of reporting, under any circumstances.
From April 2021, electronic reporting by directly entering information on a website became possible.
Nothing in particular is issued to a reporter who has submitted a report.
AnswerC. From April 2021, electronic reporting by directly entering information on a website became possible.
From April 2021, this reporting became possible electronically, by directly entering information on a website. A report can be made to the extent information can be obtained from a purchaser or other person (not limited to the person who suffered the health harm). When considered necessary from a safety-measures standpoint, a report also needs to be made for health harm believed to be caused by overdose or misuse. A confirmation-of-receipt document for safety information is issued to the reporter.
Q13 | The 15-Day Reporting Deadline
In the corporate reporting system for side effects, among other things, which of the following is the correct reporting deadline for a death case (domestic) that is unpredictable from the precautions for use, among side-effect cases suspected of being caused by a pharmaceutical?
Within 7 days
Within 30 days
Periodic report
Within 15 days
AnswerD. Within 15 days
Among side-effect cases unpredictable from the precautions for use, death cases and serious (excluding death) cases are both reported within 15 days, whether domestic or foreign. A periodic report is used for a non-serious domestic case that is unpredictable from the precautions for use. Within 30 days applies to a serious (excluding death) case predictable from the precautions for use, other than one obtained within two years after approval or through post-marketing surveillance immediately after launch, among other cases; there is no "within 7 days" category.
Q14 | The 30-Day Reporting Deadline
In the corporate reporting system for side effects, among other things, which of the following is the correct reporting deadline, among serious (excluding death) side-effect cases predictable from the precautions for use, for a case other than one obtained within two years after approval as a pharmaceutical containing a new active ingredient, or through post-marketing surveillance immediately after launch, among other such means?
Within 30 days
No reporting obligation
Periodic report
Within 15 days
AnswerA. Within 30 days
Among serious (excluding death) cases predictable from the precautions for use, one obtained within two years after approval as a pharmaceutical containing a new active ingredient, or through post-marketing surveillance immediately after launch, is reported within 15 days, while one other than these ("other than the above") is reported within 30 days. Even a predictable case is reported within 15 days if it is a death case. A periodic report is the category for a non-serious domestic case unpredictable from the precautions for use; it does not mean there is no reporting obligation.
Q15 | Categories of Reporting Deadlines
Which of the following statements about reporting deadlines in the corporate reporting system for side effects, among other things, is incorrect?
Among side-effect cases suspected of being caused by a pharmaceutical, a non-serious domestic case unpredictable from the precautions for use is handled as a periodic report.
A serious case (including death) whose occurrence pattern of side effects cannot be predicted from the precautions for use, among other sources, is reported within 30 days.
A research report indicating a risk of cancer or another serious disease, disorder, or death occurring due to a side effect or infection is reported within 30 days.
A report on measures taken overseas to prevent the occurrence or spread of harm to public health and hygiene, such as discontinuation of manufacture, import, or sale, recall, or disposal, in a foreign country (a report on overseas measures) is made within 15 days.
AnswerB. A serious case (including death) whose occurrence pattern of side effects cannot be predicted from the precautions for use, among other sources, is reported within 30 days.
The reporting deadline for a serious side-effect case (including death) whose occurrence pattern cannot be predicted from the precautions for use, among other sources, is within 15 days, not within 30 days. A serious case (including death) in which a change in the occurrence pattern indicates a risk of the occurrence or spread of harm to public health and hygiene is also within 15 days. An unpredictable non-serious domestic case is a periodic report, a report on overseas measures is within 15 days, and a research report is within 30 days; the other three options are correct as recorded in Appended Table 5-4.
Q16 | The Corporate Reporting System
Which of the following statements about the corporate reporting system for side effects, among other things, is correct?
Reporting of side effects, among other things, by a manufacturing and marketing business operator is not a legal obligation, but a duty of effort.
A manufacturing and marketing business operator, among others, is obligated, under Article 68-10, Paragraph 1 of the Act, to report to the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare by a prescribed deadline, upon learning of the occurrence of health harm, among other things, suspected of being caused by a side effect, for a pharmaceutical it has manufactured and marketed, or for which it has obtained approval.
This system was first institutionalized by the 2002 amendment of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act.
No provision requiring a pharmacy owner, medicine-sales business operator, or medical professional (including a registered seller) to endeavor to cooperate with information collection for appropriate use of a pharmaceutical carried out by a manufacturing and marketing business operator is established, and these parties have no need to cooperate in information collection.
AnswerB. A manufacturing and marketing business operator, among others, is obligated, under Article 68-10, Paragraph 1 of the Act, to report to the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare by a prescribed deadline, upon learning of the occurrence of health harm, among other things, suspected of being caused by a side effect, for a pharmaceutical it has manufactured and marketed, or for which it has obtained approval.
A manufacturing and marketing business operator, among others, is obligated, under Article 68-10, Paragraph 1 of the Act, to report by a prescribed deadline (in practice, the report is submitted to the Agency); this is not a duty of effort. A pharmacy owner, medicine-sales business operator, or medical professional (including a registered seller) must endeavor to cooperate with information collection carried out by a manufacturing and marketing business operator, under Article 68-2-6, Paragraph 2 of the Act. This system was institutionalized by the 1979 amendment of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act, and the obligation of information collection was made explicit by the 1996 amendment.
Q17 | Reexamination System
Which of the following statements about post-approval investigation of an over-the-counter medicine is correct?
For a product containing an active ingredient clearly different from an existing pharmaceutical, the reexamination system is applied, under which the manufacturing and marketing business operator, among others, accumulates post-approval usage results, among other data, over a fixed period (roughly 8 years) set by the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare at the time of approval within a period not exceeding 10 years, and submits it to the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare.
The investigation period under the reexamination system, which applies to a product containing an active ingredient clearly different from an existing pharmaceutical, is roughly 3 years, as set by the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare at the time of approval.
Unlike a prescription pharmaceutical, a post-approval investigation is not required of the manufacturing and marketing business operator, among others, for an over-the-counter medicine.
For a product that, for the first time, includes in an over-the-counter medicine (OTC medicine) an active ingredient that had been used in a prescription pharmaceutical, a safety investigation of roughly 3 years, as set by the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare at the time of approval within a period not exceeding 10 years, is required as a condition of approval, and it is designated as a Class 1 pharmaceutical.
AnswerA. For a product containing an active ingredient clearly different from an existing pharmaceutical, the reexamination system is applied, under which the manufacturing and marketing business operator, among others, accumulates post-approval usage results, among other data, over a fixed period (roughly 8 years) set by the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare at the time of approval within a period not exceeding 10 years, and submits it to the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare.
For a product containing an active ingredient clearly different from an existing pharmaceutical, the reexamination system applies over a fixed period (roughly 8 years) set by the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare at the time of approval, within a period not exceeding 10 years. The roughly 3-year period is the safety-investigation period required as a condition of approval for a product that, for the first time, includes in an OTC medicine an active ingredient that had been used in a prescription pharmaceutical (which is designated as a designated-guidance-required pharmaceutical, not a Class 1 pharmaceutical). A post-approval investigation is also required for an over-the-counter medicine.
Q18 | Evaluation and Measures
Which of the following statements about the evaluation and measures concerning side-effect information, among other things, is correct?
A partial change to the efficacy/effect or method/dosage of use is never carried out as an administrative measure necessary for safety.
The administrative measures necessary for safety do not include recalling a product.
The Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare takes administrative measures necessary for safety after hearing the opinion of the prefectural governor.
Side-effect information collected through the various systems is examined and studied by the Agency, hearing the opinions of expert committee members.
AnswerD. Side-effect information collected through the various systems is examined and studied by the Agency, hearing the opinions of expert committee members.
Side-effect information collected through the various systems is examined and studied by the Agency, hearing the opinions of expert committee members, and based on the results, the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare, after hearing the opinion of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Council (not the prefectural governor), takes administrative measures necessary for safety, such as information provision to call attention through an instruction to revise the precautions for use, a partial change to the efficacy/effect or method/dosage of use, an instruction to conduct an investigation or test, discontinuation of manufacturing or sale, and recall of the product.
Q19 | Structure of the Relief System
Which of the following statements about the Relief System for Sufferers from Adverse Drug Reactions is correct?
This system began operation in May 1990 as a public system based on the social responsibility of pharmaceutical companies.
Various benefits are provided based on the result of a determination made by the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare, after receiving a claim for benefits from the person who suffered the health harm (or their family), and after deliberation and response by the Pharmaceutical Affairs Council on matters requiring medical and pharmacological judgment.
A designated-guidance-required pharmaceutical and an over-the-counter medicine are not included among the pharmaceuticals covered by this system.
Relief benefits are provided based on the result of a determination made by the president of the Agency, after receiving a claim for benefits from the person who suffered the health harm (or their family), and after deliberation and response by the Pharmaceutical Affairs Council on matters requiring medical and pharmacological judgment.
AnswerB. Various benefits are provided based on the result of a determination made by the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare, after receiving a claim for benefits from the person who suffered the health harm (or their family), and after deliberation and response by the Pharmaceutical Affairs Council on matters requiring medical and pharmacological judgment.
Relief benefits are provided based on the result of a determination made by the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare (not the president of the Agency), after receiving a claim for benefits from the person who suffered the health harm (or their family), and after deliberation and response by the Pharmaceutical Affairs Council on matters requiring medical and pharmacological judgment, such as whether the health harm was caused by a pharmaceutical's side effect. This system began operation in May 1980 as a public system based on the social responsibility of pharmaceutical companies. The pharmaceuticals covered also include a designated-guidance-required pharmaceutical and an over-the-counter medicine.
Q20 | Cost Burden
Which of the following statements about the cost burden of the Relief System for Sufferers from Adverse Drug Reactions is correct?
The benefit costs are covered entirely by the national treasury.
Regarding the benefit costs, contributions paid annually by manufacturing and marketing business operators are allocated to them.
The administrative costs are covered entirely by contributions from manufacturing and marketing business operators.
An amount equal to half of the administrative costs is covered by prefectural burden.
AnswerB. Regarding the benefit costs, contributions paid annually by manufacturing and marketing business operators are allocated to them.
Among the costs necessary for relief-benefit operations, the benefit costs are allocated from contributions paid annually by manufacturing and marketing business operators, based on the provisions of Article 19 of the Act on the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. As for the administrative costs, an amount equal to half of them is covered by a national treasury subsidy (not by prefectural burden). The statements that the benefit costs are entirely national-treasury-funded, or that the administrative costs are entirely funded by manufacturing and marketing business operators, are both incorrect.
Q21 | Types of Benefits
Which of the following is NOT among the types of benefits under the Relief System for Sufferers from Adverse Drug Reactions?
Disabled-child rearing pension
Bereaved-family lump-sum payment
Work-leave allowance
Medical allowance
AnswerC. Work-leave allowance
The types of benefits are the seven: medical expenses, medical allowance, disability pension, disabled-child rearing pension, bereaved-family pension, bereaved-family lump-sum payment, and funeral expenses; there is no benefit called "work-leave allowance." The medical allowance is a fixed-amount benefit focused on covering costs other than medical expenses associated with treatment; the disabled-child rearing pension is a benefit for a person raising someone under 18 who is in a certain degree of disability; and the bereaved-family lump-sum payment is a benefit intended as condolence, among other purposes, to the family when a person other than the household's breadwinner has died.
Q22 | Claim Deadlines
Which of the following statements about the benefits and their claim deadlines under the Relief System for Sufferers from Adverse Drug Reactions is correct?
A claim deadline exists for the disability pension, but no claim deadline is set for the disabled-child rearing pension or medical expenses.
The claim deadline for medical expenses is within 5 years from when payment of the expenses eligible for the medical-expense benefit was made.
Unlike the case for the bereaved-family lump-sum payment or funeral expenses, no claim deadline is set for the bereaved-family pension.
Unlike medical expenses, no claim deadline is set for funeral expenses.
AnswerB. The claim deadline for medical expenses is within 5 years from when payment of the expenses eligible for the medical-expense benefit was made.
The claim deadline for medical expenses is within 5 years from when payment of the eligible expenses was made. No claim deadline is set for the disability pension and the disabled-child rearing pension; medical expenses do have a deadline (option 1 has this backward). The bereaved-family pension's deadline is within 5 years of the death (within 2 years if a benefit decision concerning medical expenses, among other things, was made before the death, or if a person with a higher claim priority has died), and the deadlines for the bereaved-family lump-sum payment and funeral expenses are the same as for the bereaved-family pension — a deadline is set for all of them.
Q23 | Disability Pension
Which of the following statements about the disability pension under the Relief System for Sufferers from Adverse Drug Reactions is correct?
It is a fixed-amount benefit considered to be provided for the purpose of, among other things, compensating for the living expenses of a person under 18 who is in a certain degree of disability due to a pharmaceutical's side effect, and it is considered that no claim deadline is set.
The benefit is a fixed-amount benefit limited to a maximum of 10 years.
The claim deadline is set at within 5 years from when the state of disability arose.
It is a fixed-amount benefit provided for the purpose of, among other things, compensating for the living expenses of a person aged 18 or older who is in a certain degree of disability due to a pharmaceutical's side effect, and no claim deadline is set.
AnswerD. It is a fixed-amount benefit provided for the purpose of, among other things, compensating for the living expenses of a person aged 18 or older who is in a certain degree of disability due to a pharmaceutical's side effect, and no claim deadline is set.
The disability pension is a fixed-amount benefit provided for the purpose of, among other things, compensating for the living expenses of a person aged 18 or older who is in a certain degree of disability due to a pharmaceutical's side effect, and no claim deadline is set. The benefit related to a person under 18 is the disabled-child rearing pension, provided to the person raising that child (this benefit likewise has no claim deadline). A maximum of 10 years applies to the bereaved-family pension; no such limit is stated for the disability pension.
Q24 | Medical Expenses and the Medical Allowance
Which of the following statements about medical expenses and the medical allowance under the Relief System for Sufferers from Adverse Drug Reactions is correct?
Medical expenses and the medical allowance are provided for a disease caused by a side effect that is severe enough to require only outpatient treatment.
The claim deadline for the medical allowance is within 5 years from the first day of the month following the month in which the medical treatment concerned was provided.
The medical allowance compensates, at actual cost, the expenses required to treat a disease caused by a pharmaceutical's side effect.
Medical expenses are a fixed-amount benefit.
AnswerB. The claim deadline for the medical allowance is within 5 years from the first day of the month following the month in which the medical treatment concerned was provided.
The claim deadline for the medical allowance is within 5 years from the first day of the month following the month in which the medical treatment concerned was provided. Medical expenses are not a fixed amount but an actual-cost compensation for expenses required for treatment (the self-pay portion after deducting the amount covered by health insurance, among other things); it is the medical allowance that is a fixed-amount benefit focused on costs other than medical expenses (options 1 and 2 have these reversed). Medical expenses and the medical allowance are provided when the disease caused by the side effect is severe enough to "require hospitalization treatment."
Q25 | Excluded Pharmaceuticals
Among designated-guidance-required pharmaceuticals or over-the-counter medicines, which of the following is NOT covered by the Relief System for Sufferers from Adverse Drug Reactions?
A cold remedy
An over-the-counter test kit
An analgesic/antipyretic
A germicide/disinfectant applied directly to the human body
AnswerB. An over-the-counter test kit
The pharmaceuticals not covered by the relief system, among designated-guidance-required pharmaceuticals or over-the-counter medicines, are set as: an insecticide or rodenticide (excluding one applied directly to the human body), a germicide/disinfectant (excluding one applied directly to the human body), an over-the-counter test kit, and some pharmaceuticals listed in the Japanese Pharmacopoeia (purified water, petrolatum, etc.). Because a germicide/disinfectant is excluded from the exclusion "if applied directly to the human body," one applied directly to the human body is covered. A cold remedy and an analgesic/antipyretic are not among the excluded items.
Q26 | Scope of Exclusion
Which of the following statements about the scope of coverage of the Relief System for Sufferers from Adverse Drug Reactions is incorrect?
Some pharmaceuticals listed in the Japanese Pharmacopoeia (purified water, petrolatum, etc.) are not covered by the relief system.
An insecticide or rodenticide (excluding one applied directly to the human body) is not covered by the relief system.
Health harm from the use of an unapproved, unauthorized pharmaceutical (including a pharmaceutical obtained through personal import) is not covered by the relief system.
A germicide/disinfectant applied directly to the human body is not covered by the relief system.
AnswerD. A germicide/disinfectant applied directly to the human body is not covered by the relief system.
A germicide/disinfectant is excluded from coverage only "if not applied directly to the human body"; one applied directly to the human body is covered by the relief system. An insecticide or rodenticide (excluding one applied directly to the human body), an over-the-counter test kit, and some pharmaceuticals listed in the Japanese Pharmacopoeia (purified water, petrolatum, etc.) are excluded, and health harm from the use of an unapproved, unauthorized pharmaceutical (including one sold as a so-called health food, as well as one obtained through personal import) is also excluded from coverage.
Q27 | Scope of Benefit Eligibility
Which of the following statements about the scope of eligibility for relief benefits under the Relief System for Sufferers from Adverse Drug Reactions is correct?
Even health harm arising from appropriate use of a pharmaceutical is included in the scope of benefits if it is a mild case that resolved without particularly requiring treatment at a medical institution.
The scope of relief benefits also includes a case where hospitalization treatment is recognized as necessary but home care was unavoidably chosen instead.
When it cannot be determined whether something is a pharmaceutical's side effect, a claim for benefits cannot be made.
Health harm from inappropriate use of a pharmaceutical is also eligible for relief benefits.
AnswerB. The scope of relief benefits also includes a case where hospitalization treatment is recognized as necessary but home care was unavoidably chosen instead.
The degree of health harm eligible for relief benefits is a case such as one requiring medical care to the extent of hospitalization due to a disease caused by a side effect, and this is not necessarily limited to a case where hospitalization treatment actually took place — it also includes a case where hospitalization treatment is recognized as necessary but home care was unavoidably chosen instead. Health harm from inappropriate use of a pharmaceutical is not covered, and a mild case that resolved without particularly requiring treatment at a medical institution is also not included in the scope of benefits. A claim for benefits can be made even when it cannot be determined whether something is a side effect.
Q28 | Necessary Documents
Which of the following statements about claiming relief benefits for side-effect harm from the use of a designated-guidance-required pharmaceutical or an over-the-counter medicine is correct?
For the claim, in addition to a physician's diagnosis and a document certifying the medical expenses incurred (a certificate of treatment), a certificate of sale, among other documents, prepared by the pharmacy owner or medicine-sales business operator that sold the pharmaceutical, among others, is also required.
A claim for benefits is limited to the person who suffered the health harm, and cannot be made by that person's family.
A professional engaged in the sale of a pharmaceutical need not comply even if a purchaser requests issuance of a certificate of sale.
For the claim, a physician's diagnosis and a document certifying the medical expenses incurred (a certificate of treatment) are required, but a document such as a certificate of sale prepared by the pharmacy owner or medicine-sales business operator that sold the pharmaceutical is not required.
AnswerA. For the claim, in addition to a physician's diagnosis and a document certifying the medical expenses incurred (a certificate of treatment), a certificate of sale, among other documents, prepared by the pharmacy owner or medicine-sales business operator that sold the pharmaceutical, among others, is also required.
For a claim for relief benefits, in addition to a physician's diagnosis, a certificate of treatment, and other documents, a certificate of sale, among other documents, prepared by the pharmacy owner or medicine-sales business operator that sold the pharmaceutical, among others, is also required. A claim for benefits can be made by the person who suffered the health harm or by that person's family. A professional engaged in the sale of a pharmaceutical is expected to respond smoothly to a request for issuance of a certificate of sale, so the statement that there is no need to comply is incorrect.
Q29 | The Pharmaceutical PL Center
Which of the following statements about the Pharmaceutical PL Center is correct?
It is a consultation body established by the Agency.
For a complaint concerning a pharmaceutical or quasi-drug (including harm other than health harm), it accepts consultations from a consumer negotiating with the manufacturing and marketing company, from a fair and neutral standpoint, and mediates and coordinates the negotiation.
It aims to lead the matter to resolution through litigation.
For a case where the pharmaceutical company bears liability for damages, such as a defective product, consulting the Pharmaceutical PL Center is not recommended, since the case is covered by the Relief System for Sufferers from Adverse Drug Reactions.
AnswerB. For a complaint concerning a pharmaceutical or quasi-drug (including harm other than health harm), it accepts consultations from a consumer negotiating with the manufacturing and marketing company, from a fair and neutral standpoint, and mediates and coordinates the negotiation.
The Pharmaceutical PL Center was established by the Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association at the same time the Product Liability Act took effect in July 1995 (not by the Agency), and, for a complaint concerning a pharmaceutical or quasi-drug (including harm other than health harm), it accepts consultations from a fair and neutral standpoint, mediates and coordinates the negotiation, and aims for a prompt resolution without litigation. A case where the pharmaceutical company bears liability for damages, such as a defective product, is not covered by the relief system, and consulting the Pharmaceutical PL Center is recommended for such a case.
Q30 | Biological Products
Which of the following statements about relief for health harm is correct?
Health harm from an infection, among other things, transmitted via a biological product is to be provided relief through the Relief System for Sufferers from Adverse Drug Reactions.
The Relief System for Sufferers from Infections, Etc. via Biological Products provides benefits for a disease, disability, or death caused by an infection, among other things, transmitted despite appropriate use of a biological product, on or after April 1, 2004.
Although entrusted by related pharmaceutical companies or the national government, the Agency does not handle the payment of health-management allowances or nursing-care expenses to SMON patients for whom a court settlement has been reached.
The Relief System for Sufferers from Adverse Drug Reactions was created by the 1959 amendment of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act, as a public system based on the social responsibility of pharmaceutical companies, in light of the Thalidomide incident, the SMON incident, and other such events, to provide prompt relief for health harm from a pharmaceutical's side effects.
AnswerB. The Relief System for Sufferers from Infections, Etc. via Biological Products provides benefits for a disease, disability, or death caused by an infection, among other things, transmitted despite appropriate use of a biological product, on or after April 1, 2004.
The Relief System for Sufferers from Infections, Etc. via Biological Products was created at the time of the 2002 amendment of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act, and provides benefits for a disease, disability, or death caused by an infection, among other things, transmitted despite appropriate use of a biological product, on or after April 1, 2004. The Relief System for Sufferers from Adverse Drug Reactions was created at the time of the 1979 amendment of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act. The Agency, entrusted by related pharmaceutical companies or the national government, handles the payment of health-management allowances and nursing-care expenses to SMON patients for whom a court settlement has been reached. Infection, among other things, transmitted via a biological product is provided relief through a system separate from the Relief System for Sufferers from Adverse Drug Reactions.
Q31 | Ampule Cold Remedies
Which of the following statements about ampule-form cold remedies is correct?
An ampule preparation was confirmed to have slower absorption of the active ingredient than other dosage forms (tablets, powders, etc.), so blood concentration never rapidly reaches a high level, and there is no risk of a side effect at the normal dose.
The serious side effect that occurred was interstitial pneumonia, with deaths occurring between 1959 and 1965.
It was confirmed that there is no risk of a side effect as long as the normal dose is observed.
A serious side effect (shock) from the use of an ampule-form cold remedy containing the analgesic/antipyretic ingredients aminopyrine and sulpyrine caused a total of 38 deaths between 1959 and 1965.
AnswerD. A serious side effect (shock) from the use of an ampule-form cold remedy containing the analgesic/antipyretic ingredients aminopyrine and sulpyrine caused a total of 38 deaths between 1959 and 1965.
A serious side effect (shock) from the use of an ampule-form cold remedy containing aminopyrine and sulpyrine caused a total of 38 deaths between 1959 and 1965. An ampule preparation was confirmed to have faster absorption than other dosage forms, with blood concentration rapidly reaching a high level, making a side effect more likely to occur even at the normal dose. The side effect was shock; interstitial pneumonia relates to the cases of Sho-saiko-to and over-the-counter cold remedies.
Q32 | Response to the Ampule Cases
Which of the following statements about the response to the side-effect cases from ampule-form cold remedies is correct?
In 1965, the then Ministry of Health and Welfare requested the related pharmaceutical companies to recall ampule-form cold remedy products.
In 1965, the then Ministry of Health and Welfare instructed the related pharmaceutical companies to distribute emergency safety information.
The then Ministry of Health and Welfare instructed the related pharmaceutical companies to promptly switch to an alternative ingredient.
It was concluded that immediate suspension of sales was unnecessary, and the response was limited to calling attention.
AnswerA. In 1965, the then Ministry of Health and Welfare requested the related pharmaceutical companies to recall ampule-form cold remedy products.
Because it was confirmed that a side effect could occur more readily even at the normal dose with an ampule-form cold remedy, in 1965 the then Ministry of Health and Welfare requested the related pharmaceutical companies to recall the products. Subsequently, in 1970, approval standards for over-the-counter cold remedies were established. The instruction to distribute emergency safety information concerns interstitial pneumonia caused by Sho-saiko-to (March 1996); the instruction to switch to an alternative ingredient (such as PSE) concerns pharmaceuticals containing PPA; and the attention-calling response stating that "immediate suspension of sales is unnecessary" concerns the November 2000 response to PPA — these all relate to different cases.
Q33 | Sho-Saiko-To
Which of the following statements about interstitial pneumonia caused by Sho-saiko-to is correct?
The patients who developed interstitial pneumonia after using Sho-saiko-to and reached a serious outcome, including death, were patients with chronic renal failure.
Because cases occurred in which a patient using Sho-saiko-to reached a serious outcome including death, in March 1996 the then Ministry of Health and Welfare requested the related pharmaceutical companies to recall Sho-saiko-to products.
The serious side effect that occurred from concomitant use of Sho-saiko-to and an interferon preparation was shock.
Because interstitial pneumonia was reported in cases of concomitant use of Sho-saiko-to and an interferon preparation, in January 1994 the precautions for use were revised to state that concomitant use with an interferon preparation is contraindicated.
AnswerD. Because interstitial pneumonia was reported in cases of concomitant use of Sho-saiko-to and an interferon preparation, in January 1994 the precautions for use were revised to state that concomitant use with an interferon preparation is contraindicated.
Because interstitial pneumonia was reported in cases of concomitant use of Sho-saiko-to and an interferon preparation, in January 1994 the precautions for use were revised to state that concomitant use is contraindicated. Even after this, cases occurred in which a patient with chronic hepatitis (not chronic renal failure) developed interstitial pneumonia after using Sho-saiko-to and reached a serious outcome including death, and what was instructed in March 1996 was distribution of emergency safety information, not a product recall. Shock relates to the case of ampule-form cold remedies.
Q34 | Sho-Saiko-To Follow-Up
Which of the following statements about interstitial pneumonia caused by Sho-saiko-to is incorrect?
Interstitial pneumonia caused by Sho-saiko-to had been stated in the precautions for use from April 1991 onward.
In March 1996, the then Ministry of Health and Welfare instructed the related pharmaceutical companies to distribute emergency safety information.
No case of interstitial pneumonia was reported after the precautions for use were revised to state that concomitant use with an interferon preparation is contraindicated.
There were cases in which a patient with chronic hepatitis developed interstitial pneumonia after using Sho-saiko-to and reached a serious outcome, including death.
AnswerC. No case of interstitial pneumonia was reported after the precautions for use were revised to state that concomitant use with an interferon preparation is contraindicated.
Even after the January 1994 revision of the precautions for use stating that concomitant use with an interferon preparation is contraindicated, there were cases in which a patient with chronic hepatitis developed interstitial pneumonia after using Sho-saiko-to and reached a serious outcome including death. Because of this, in March 1996 the then Ministry of Health and Welfare instructed the related pharmaceutical companies to distribute emergency safety information. Interstitial pneumonia had been stated in the precautions for use from April 1991 onward, and the other three options are correct as stated in the Guide.
Q35 | Cold Remedy Pneumonia
Which of the following statements about interstitial pneumonia caused by over-the-counter cold remedies is correct?
The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare came to instruct the related pharmaceutical companies to distribute emergency safety information.
The early symptoms of interstitial pneumonia can easily be distinguished from the general symptoms of a cold, which are the efficacy claim of an over-the-counter cold remedy.
For only the products for which cases of interstitial pneumonia had been reported by May 2003, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare requested the related pharmaceutical companies in June of that year to recall those products, and no revision of the precautions for use was carried out.
Based on a total of 26 cases of interstitial pneumonia suspected of being caused by the use of over-the-counter cold remedies reported by May 2003, an instruction to revise the precautions for use for over-the-counter cold remedies in general was issued in June of that year.
AnswerD. Based on a total of 26 cases of interstitial pneumonia suspected of being caused by the use of over-the-counter cold remedies reported by May 2003, an instruction to revise the precautions for use for over-the-counter cold remedies in general was issued in June of that year.
By May 2003, a total of 26 cases of interstitial pneumonia suspected of being caused by the use of over-the-counter cold remedies had been reported, and the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare instructed, in June of that year, a revision of the precautions for use for over-the-counter cold remedies in general. The response was an instruction to revise the precautions for use, not a request for product recall (as with ampule-form cold remedies) or an instruction to distribute emergency safety information (as with Sho-saiko-to). Interstitial pneumonia is a serious side effect, and its early symptoms are considered difficult to distinguish from the general symptoms of a cold.
Q36 | Cold Remedy Attention-Calling
Which of the following statements about the revision of the precautions for use in light of interstitial pneumonia caused by over-the-counter cold remedies is correct?
The revision led to the suspension of sales of over-the-counter cold remedies for which cases of interstitial pneumonia had been reported.
Because serious symptoms of interstitial pneumonia can rarely occur, and these symptoms are difficult to distinguish from the general symptoms of a cold, attention came to be called for with wording such as "if symptoms worsen, discontinue use and see a physician."
Before the revision, no precaution such as "if symptoms do not improve after taking the medicine five or six times, discontinue use and consult a professional" was made at all for over-the-counter cold remedies, and it is considered that no attention was called concerning taking the medicine.
In light of the occurrence of interstitial pneumonia, approval standards for over-the-counter cold remedies came to be established in 1970.
AnswerB. Because serious symptoms of interstitial pneumonia can rarely occur, and these symptoms are difficult to distinguish from the general symptoms of a cold, attention came to be called for with wording such as "if symptoms worsen, discontinue use and see a physician."
In the June 2003 revision, because serious symptoms of interstitial pneumonia can rarely occur, and these symptoms are difficult to distinguish from the general symptoms of a cold, attention came to be called for with wording such as "if symptoms worsen, discontinue use and see a physician." Even before this, a precaution such as "if symptoms do not improve after taking the medicine five or six times, discontinue use and consult a professional" had already been in place. This was not a measure of suspending sales, and the establishment of approval standards for over-the-counter cold remedies was the 1970 response to the ampule-form cold remedy cases.
Q37 | PPA
Which of the following statements about phenylpropanolamine hydrochloride (PPA) is correct?
It was included in oral rhinitis medicines, antitussive/expectorant medicines, cold remedies, and the like, for the purpose of relieving nasal or conjunctival congestion and symptoms such as nasal blockage.
In Japan, it had been approved not as an oral rhinitis medicine but as an appetite suppressant.
As the alternative ingredient, it was instructed to switch not to pseudoephedrine hydrochloride (PSE) but promptly to aminopyrine.
In the United States, a link was reported between the risk of hemorrhagic stroke and use by women at a higher dose than the amount included in Japan, as a diabetes treatment drug.
AnswerA. It was included in oral rhinitis medicines, antitussive/expectorant medicines, cold remedies, and the like, for the purpose of relieving nasal or conjunctival congestion and symptoms such as nasal blockage.
PPA was included in oral rhinitis medicines, antitussive/expectorant medicines, cold remedies, and the like, for the purpose of relieving nasal or conjunctival congestion and symptoms such as nasal blockage. What was reported in the United States was a link between the risk of hemorrhagic stroke and use by women as an appetite suppressant (at a higher dose than the amount included in Japan); in Japan it was not approved as an appetite suppressant. The alternative ingredient instructed was a switch to pseudoephedrine hydrochloride (PSE) and the like; aminopyrine is the ingredient that appears in the case of ampule-form cold remedies.
Q38 | Response to PPA
Which of the following statements about the response to pharmaceuticals containing phenylpropanolamine hydrochloride (PPA) is incorrect?
The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare instructed the related pharmaceutical companies, among others, to revise the precautions for use, thoroughly provide information, and, as an alternative ingredient, promptly switch to pseudoephedrine hydrochloride (PSE) and the like.
In May 2000, in the United States, it was reported that there was a high likelihood of a link between use by women as an appetite suppressant and the risk of hemorrhagic stroke.
In Japan, in response to the report from the United States, sales of all PPA-containing pharmaceuticals were immediately suspended in November 2000.
Many of the side-effect cases such as cerebral hemorrhage reported by August 2003 resulted from use exceeding the range of the approved method and dosage, or use by a hypertensive patient, for whom it was contraindicated.
AnswerC. In Japan, in response to the report from the United States, sales of all PPA-containing pharmaceuticals were immediately suspended in November 2000.
Because PPA was not approved in Japan as an appetite suppressant, among other reasons, it was concluded in November 2000 that immediate suspension of sales was unnecessary, and attention was instead called for so that a person with heart disease, a history of cerebral hemorrhage, or the like would avoid use; sales were not immediately suspended. Subsequently, by August 2003, multiple side-effect cases such as cerebral hemorrhage were reported (many resulting from overdose or use by a contraindicated hypertensive patient), and a revision of the precautions for use, thorough information provision, and a prompt switch to PSE and the like were instructed. The other three options are correct.
Q39 | Medicine and Health Week
Which of the following statements about "Medicine and Health Week" is correct?
It aims to contribute to the maintenance and improvement of public health and hygiene by spreading correct knowledge widely among consumers about the characteristics of pharmaceuticals and their use and handling, among other matters, and is held every year for the one-week period from October 17 to 23.
It is carried out by the national government, local governments, related organizations, and the like, with the sole aim of promoting the prevention of drug abuse, rather than spreading correct knowledge widely among consumers about the characteristics of pharmaceuticals and their use and handling, among other matters.
It is held every year for the one-month period from June 20 to July 19, and aims to promote the prevention of drug abuse.
It is carried out only by pharmaceutical companies, with no involvement from the national government, local governments, related organizations, or the like.
AnswerA. It aims to contribute to the maintenance and improvement of public health and hygiene by spreading correct knowledge widely among consumers about the characteristics of pharmaceuticals and their use and handling, among other matters, and is held every year for the one-week period from October 17 to 23.
"Medicine and Health Week" aims to contribute to the maintenance and improvement of public health and hygiene by spreading correct knowledge widely among consumers about the characteristics of pharmaceuticals and their use and handling, among other matters, and public-relations activities and events are carried out by the national government, local governments, related organizations, and the like every year for the one-week period from October 17 to 23. It is the "Dame. Zettai." ("No Way. Absolutely Not.") awareness campaign, held for the one-month period from June 20 to July 19, that aims to promote the prevention of drug abuse, and this is not carried out only by pharmaceutical companies.
Q40 | Dame Zettai
Which of the following statements about the "Dame. Zettai." awareness campaign and the prevention of drug abuse is correct?
It is held every year for the one-month period from June 20 to July 19, to spread awareness of "6/26 International Day Against Drug Abuse" and further promote the prevention of drug abuse.
Drug abuse and drug dependence are limited to those caused by illegal drugs (narcotics, stimulants, etc.), and never arise from an over-the-counter medicine.
It is held every year for the one-week period from October 17 to 23.
It is considered that awareness activities concerning the importance of a pharmaceutical's appropriate use, among other matters, should not be conducted for elementary and junior high school students.
AnswerA. It is held every year for the one-month period from June 20 to July 19, to spread awareness of "6/26 International Day Against Drug Abuse" and further promote the prevention of drug abuse.
The "Dame. Zettai." awareness campaign is carried out every year for the one-month period from June 20 to July 19 by the national government, local governments, related organizations, and the like, to spread awareness of "6/26 International Day Against Drug Abuse" and further promote the prevention of drug abuse. The one-week period from October 17 to 23 is "Medicine and Health Week." Drug abuse and drug dependence are said to arise not only from illegal drugs but also, potentially, from over-the-counter medicines, and it is considered important to raise awareness of the importance of a pharmaceutical's appropriate use, among other matters, starting from elementary and junior high school age.
Practice: answer the questions on this page
This practice tool asks questions in random order (it works when JavaScript is enabled). You can still read all the questions and explanations above without it.
* The explanations are information for study purposes. Exam scope and systems change from year to year, so always check the official announcements of the organization that administers the exam.
This page is a translation of the Japanese original. If the translation and the original differ, the Japanese version takes precedence. View the Japanese original