Who counts as an "educational public servant" under the Act on Special Provisions concerning Educational Public Service Personnel (教育公務員特例法)?
A teacher at a private junior high school
A supervisory education officer (指導主事) at a city board of education
An administrative staff member at a public elementary school
A teacher at an elementary school attached to a national university corporation
AnswerB. A supervisory education officer (指導主事) at a city board of education
Article 2 of the Act defines educational public servants as presidents, principals, teachers and department heads of public schools, plus specialist education staff of boards of education (supervisory education officers and social education officers). So a supervisory education officer is included. Private-school teachers are not public servants. Administrative staff at a public elementary school are local public servants, but not principals or teachers, so they are not covered. Schools attached to national university corporations are not public schools set up by a local government, so their teachers are not included either.
Q2 | Prefecture-funded school staff
For prefecture-funded staff (県費負担教職員) at municipal elementary and junior high schools, which pairing is correct?
The municipal board of education appoints them, and the prefectural board of education supervises their service
The municipal board of education both appoints them and supervises their service
The prefectural board of education both appoints them and supervises their service
The prefectural board of education appoints them, and the municipal board of education supervises their service
AnswerD. The prefectural board of education appoints them, and the municipal board of education supervises their service
Article 37 of the Act on the Organization and Operation of Local Educational Administration (地教行法) gives the power of appointment to the prefectural board, and Article 43(1) says the municipal board supervises their service. The option that swaps the two is wrong, and so are the options in which one board does everything.
Q3 | Required school posts
Under Article 37 of the School Education Act (学校教育法), which set of posts must, as a rule, be placed in an elementary school (also applied to junior high schools by Article 49)?
Article 37(1) requires a principal, a vice-principal (教頭), teachers, nurse teachers and administrative staff. Deputy principals, senior teachers, advanced skill teachers, lead teachers and nutrition teachers are posts that "may be placed" under Article 37(2). The other options mix optional posts into the required list.
Q4 | Lead teachers
Which matches the School Education Act (学校教育法) description of the duties of a "lead teacher" (主務教諭), a post schools may place from April 2026?
Assists the principal, organizes part of the school affairs as instructed, and takes charge of educating children
Takes charge of educating children and gives guidance and advice to other teachers to improve their teaching
Takes charge of educating children and, as instructed, coordinates educational activities among teachers and other staff
Takes charge of school affairs and supervises the staff of the school
AnswerC. Takes charge of educating children and, as instructed, coordinates educational activities among teachers and other staff
Article 37(11) says a lead teacher takes charge of educating children and, as instructed, carries out overall coordination among teachers and other staff about the school's educational activities. Organizing part of the school affairs is the duty of a senior teacher (主幹教諭), giving guidance and advice is the duty of an advanced skill teacher (指導教諭), and taking charge of school affairs and supervising staff is the principal's duty.
Q5 | Hiring teachers
Which statement about hiring public school teachers matches the Act on Special Provisions concerning Educational Public Service Personnel (教育公務員特例法)?
Hiring is by selection (選考), conducted by the superintendent of the board of education that is the appointing authority
Hiring is by competitive examination, conducted by the personnel commission
Hiring is by selection (選考), conducted by the principal of the school that will employ the teacher
Hiring is by competitive examination, conducted by the superintendent of the board of education
AnswerA. Hiring is by selection (選考), conducted by the superintendent of the board of education that is the appointing authority
Article 11 says the hiring and promotion of public school principals and teachers is by selection, conducted by the superintendent of the board of education that is the appointing authority. Under Article 17-2 of the Local Public Service Act (地方公務員法), local governments with a personnel commission normally hire by competitive examination, but teachers follow this special rule. No provision says the principal conducts the selection.
Q6 | Probationary appointment
As a rule, how long is the probationary appointment period for teachers at public elementary and junior high schools?
6 months
3 months
2 years
1 year
AnswerD. 1 year
Article 22 of the Local Public Service Act (地方公務員法) sets the probationary period at six months, but Article 12 of the Act on Special Provisions concerning Educational Public Service Personnel (教育公務員特例法) changes it to one year for teachers and instructors at public elementary and junior high schools and similar schools. Six months is the period for ordinary local public servants; there is no rule of three months or two years.
Q7 | Junior high school licenses
Which statement about the regular teaching license for junior high school teachers is correct?
Like the elementary school license, it covers all subjects
It is granted for each subject, such as Japanese or mathematics
It has only two grades, advanced and first class, with no second class
It is valid only in the prefecture that granted it
AnswerB. It is granted for each subject, such as Japanese or mathematics
Under Article 4(5) of the Education Personnel Certification Act (教育職員免許法), junior high (and high) school licenses are granted subject by subject. Elementary school licenses are not by subject, so "covers all subjects like the elementary license" is wrong. Only high school teacher licenses are limited to advanced and first class; junior high licenses also have a second class. Regular licenses are valid in all prefectures (Article 9).
Q8 | Validity of licenses
Under Article 9 of the Education Personnel Certification Act (教育職員免許法) (as of October 2026), which describes the validity of teaching licenses correctly?
A regular license is valid only in the granting prefecture and must be renewed every 10 years
A special license is valid in all prefectures; a temporary license has no time limit
A regular license is valid in all prefectures; a temporary license is valid for 3 years in the granting prefecture
A regular license is valid in all prefectures but expires unless renewal courses are taken every 10 years
AnswerC. A regular license is valid in all prefectures; a temporary license is valid for 3 years in the granting prefecture
Article 9 says a regular license is valid in all prefectures, a special license only in the granting prefecture, and a temporary license for three years in the granting prefecture. The license renewal system was ended on 1 July 2022, so there is no longer any 10-year renewal or renewal course. A special license is not valid nationwide.
Q9 | Teaching across school levels
Someone holds a junior high school science license. Which is correct about teaching science at an elementary school?
They can become a teacher in charge of subjects corresponding to their license subject
Without an elementary school license, they cannot take charge of any subject
They can serve as a homeroom teacher and teach all subjects
They can teach science, but not as a senior teacher or as an instructor
AnswerA. They can become a teacher in charge of subjects corresponding to their license subject
As an exception to the rule in Article 3 that teachers must hold the corresponding license, Article 16-5(1) of the Education Personnel Certification Act (教育職員免許法) lets holders of junior high or high school licenses take charge, at an elementary school, of subjects corresponding to their license subject and other matters set by ministerial ordinance, as a senior teacher, advanced skill teacher, lead teacher, teacher or instructor. So it is not true that they cannot teach any subject, nor that they can teach every subject. Senior teachers and instructors are included.
Q10 | Basic standard of service
Which matches Article 30 of the Local Public Service Act (地方公務員法) (the basic standard of service)?
Work for the interest of one's organization, and obey superiors' orders with full effort
Work for local interests as representatives of residents, and approach duties sincerely
Work for the public interest as servants of the whole community, and devote full effort to duties
Work for the national interest as servants of the whole nation, and faithfully obey laws
AnswerC. Work for the public interest as servants of the whole community, and devote full effort to duties
Article 30 says all employees must work for the public interest as servants of the whole community and devote their full effort to their duties. It does not speak of the interest of the organization, the locality or the nation. The duty to obey superiors' orders is in Article 32.
Q11 | Duty to obey orders
Which is correct about Article 32 of the Local Public Service Act (地方公務員法)?
In performing duties, employees must follow laws, ordinances and rules, and faithfully obey superiors' official orders
Employees must faithfully obey superiors' orders even about private conduct outside working hours
Superiors' orders take priority over laws, so orders that differ from laws must also be obeyed
The duty to obey superiors' orders begins only after the probationary period ends
AnswerA. In performing duties, employees must follow laws, ordinances and rules, and faithfully obey superiors' official orders
Article 32 says employees, in performing their duties, must follow laws, ordinances, local government rules and regulations, and faithfully obey superiors' official orders. It covers official orders, not orders about private conduct. Following laws is required in the same article, so orders do not take priority over laws. There is no rule exempting probationary employees.
Q12 | Conduct that damages trust
Which is correct about Article 33 of the Local Public Service Act (地方公務員法) (prohibition of conduct that damages trust)?
It covers only conduct during working hours, not private conduct on days off
It covers only acts that lead to a criminal conviction, and nothing else
It applies only to managers such as principals, not to ordinary teachers
It forbids acts that damage the trust in one's post, and can also cover off-duty conduct
AnswerD. It forbids acts that damage the trust in one's post, and can also cover off-duty conduct
Article 33 says employees must not act in ways that damage the trust in their post or bring disgrace on public posts as a whole. It is not limited to working hours, to criminal cases or to managers. So, for example, drunk driving on a day off can be treated as such conduct and lead to discipline.
Q13 | Duty of confidentiality
Which is correct about the duty of confidentiality in Article 34 of the Local Public Service Act (地方公務員法)?
It applies only while employed; after leaving, leaking is not subject to penalty
Employees must not leak secrets learned in their duties, and this continues after they leave the post
With the principal's permission, official secrets may be made public freely
Official secrets learned outside working hours are not covered by the duty
AnswerB. Employees must not leak secrets learned in their duties, and this continues after they leave the post
Article 34(1) says employees must not leak secrets learned in their duties, and the same applies after they leave the post. When an employee must reveal official secrets as a witness under law, permission from the appointing authority is needed (Article 34(2)); a principal's permission does not allow free disclosure. No rule changes the duty depending on when the secret was learned.
Q14 | Testimony and permission
When an employee, as a witness under law, will reveal matters that are official secrets, which matches Article 34 of the Local Public Service Act (地方公務員法)?
Permission from the school principal is required, and the principal may refuse if a reason is given
Permission from the personnel commission is required, and it may refuse at its own discretion
No permission is needed when testifying; the employee may decide alone
Permission from the appointing authority is required, and it cannot refuse except where a law provides otherwise
AnswerD. Permission from the appointing authority is required, and it cannot refuse except where a law provides otherwise
Article 34(2) says that when revealing official secrets as a witness or expert under law, the employee needs permission from the appointing authority (for former employees, the authority for the post they left). Article 34(3) says that permission cannot be refused unless a law provides otherwise. It is not the principal or the personnel commission that grants it, and permission is not optional.
Q15 | Duty to devote oneself to duties
Which describes Article 35 of the Local Public Service Act (地方公務員法) (duty to devote oneself to duties) correctly?
Except where a law or ordinance provides otherwise, all working hours and attention must be used for one's duties
Employees must always think only about their duties, even outside working hours
If the principal agrees, the duty can be waived freely even without a law or ordinance
Even during working hours, using at least half of one's attention on duties is enough
AnswerA. Except where a law or ordinance provides otherwise, all working hours and attention must be used for one's duties
Article 35 says employees, except where a law or ordinance specially provides, must use all their working hours and all their official attention for their duties, and engage only in the local government's work. It covers working hours, not time outside them. It can be waived only where a law or ordinance provides. The standard is "all", not "at least half".
Q16 | Political activities of teachers
Regarding limits on political activities of public school teachers, which matches Article 18 of the Act on Special Provisions concerning Educational Public Service Personnel (教育公務員特例法)?
Article 36 of the Local Public Service Act applies as is, so activities outside the employing area are not limited
For the time being, the rules for national public servants apply, including the penalty provisions of the National Public Service Act
For the time being, the rules for national public servants apply, but the penalty provisions of the National Public Service Act do not
Teachers are not required to be politically neutral, so there are no limits on political activities
AnswerC. For the time being, the rules for national public servants apply, but the penalty provisions of the National Public Service Act do not
Article 18(1) says that, for the time being and notwithstanding Article 36 of the Local Public Service Act (地方公務員法), the limits on political activities of public school educational public servants follow those for national public servants. So the "outside the area" proviso of Article 36 cannot simply be applied. Article 18(2) says this must not be read as applying the penalty in Article 110(1) of the National Public Service Act. The option saying there are no limits is also wrong.
Q17 | Ban on industrial action
Which is correct about the ban on industrial action in Article 37 of the Local Public Service Act (地方公務員法)?
Employees may join a strike if it takes place outside working hours
Employees must not strike or slow down work, and no one may plan or incite such acts
With permission from the appointing authority, employees may slow down work
Only employees' own industrial action is banned; others may incite it freely
AnswerB. Employees must not strike or slow down work, and no one may plan or incite such acts
Article 37(1) says employees must not take part in strikes, slowdowns or other industrial action, or acts that lower efficiency, and that no one ("何人も") may plan, conspire in, instigate or incite such illegal acts. There is no exception for acts outside working hours or with permission, and because it says "no one", people who are not employees are also covered.
Q18 | Holding other posts
Regarding public school teachers holding other education-related posts, which matches Article 17 of the Act on Special Provisions concerning Educational Public Service Personnel (教育公務員特例法)?
Even education-related posts can never be held with pay
Any education-related post may be held freely without anyone's approval
Even if it hinders their main duties, they may hold it with pay if the principal agrees
If the appointing authority finds it will not hinder their main duties, they may hold it, even with pay
AnswerD. If the appointing authority finds it will not hinder their main duties, they may hold it, even with pay
Article 17(1) says educational public servants may hold other education-related posts or engage in other education-related work, with or without pay, if the appointing authority (for prefecture-funded staff, the municipal board) finds it will not hinder their main duties. Pay is allowed, approval is required, and it is not allowed if it hinders their main duties.
Q19 | Status actions vs discipline
Which correctly describes the difference between status actions (分限) and disciplinary actions (懲戒)?
Status actions respond to situations such as being unable to perform duties well; discipline is a sanction for breaches and misconduct
Status actions are sanctions for misconduct; discipline responds to being unable to work because of illness
Both are sanctions for misconduct and differ only in severity
Only probationary staff receive status actions, and only formally appointed staff receive discipline
AnswerA. Status actions respond to situations such as being unable to perform duties well; discipline is a sanction for breaches and misconduct
The grounds for status actions in Article 28 of the Local Public Service Act (地方公務員法) are poor performance, physical or mental disability, lack of aptitude, and abolished posts or surplus staff: situations in which duties cannot be performed well. The grounds for discipline in Article 29 are violations of laws, breaches of official duties and misconduct unworthy of public servants, so discipline is a sanction. Options that swap them or treat them as the same are wrong. In fact, part of the status-action rules does not apply to probationary staff (Article 29-2).
Q20 | Grounds for status dismissal
Which is NOT a ground in Article 28(1) of the Local Public Service Act (地方公務員法) for demoting or dismissing an employee against their will?
Poor work performance in light of evaluations and other facts
A physical or mental disability that hinders performing duties
Abolished posts or surplus staff due to reorganization or budget cuts
Breaching official duties or neglecting duties
AnswerD. Breaching official duties or neglecting duties
The grounds in Article 28(1) are: (1) poor work performance, (2) a physical or mental disability that hinders or prevents performing duties, (3) lack of the aptitude needed for the post, and (4) abolished posts or surplus staff due to changes in organization, staff numbers or budget. Breaching or neglecting official duties is a ground for discipline under Article 29(1).
Q21 | Grounds for involuntary leave
Under Article 28(2) of the Local Public Service Act (地方公務員法), which pair gives the grounds for placing an employee on leave against their will?
Poor work performance, and being arrested in a criminal case
A physical or mental disability needing long rest, and being indicted in a criminal case
A physical or mental disability needing long rest, and having received a disciplinary action
Lacking the aptitude needed for the post, and going on to graduate school
AnswerB. A physical or mental disability needing long rest, and being indicted in a criminal case
Article 28(2) lists two grounds for leave: (1) a physical or mental disability needing long rest, and (2) being indicted in a criminal case. Poor performance and lack of aptitude are grounds for demotion or dismissal. The trigger is indictment, not arrest. Receiving discipline is not a ground for leave. Leave for graduate study is a separate system under Article 26 of the Act on Special Provisions concerning Educational Public Service Personnel (教育公務員特例法), applied for by the teacher.
Q22 | Types of discipline
Which set correctly lists the disciplinary actions in Article 29 of the Local Public Service Act (地方公務員法)?
Article 29(1) sets four disciplinary actions: reprimand, pay cut, suspension and dismissal. Admonitions (訓告) and strict warnings (厳重注意) are not among them, so they are not disciplinary actions under the Act. Salary downgrade and leave are status actions under Article 28.
Q23 | Grounds for discipline
Which is a ground for discipline under Article 29(1) of the Local Public Service Act (地方公務員法)?
A physical or mental disability needing long rest
Misconduct unworthy of a servant of the whole community
Surplus staff arising from reorganization
Lacking the aptitude needed for the post
AnswerB. Misconduct unworthy of a servant of the whole community
Article 29(1) gives three grounds for discipline: (1) violating the Act, special laws, ordinances, rules or regulations, (2) breaching or neglecting official duties, and (3) misconduct unworthy of a servant of the whole community. Long rest due to disability is a ground for status leave, and surplus staff or lack of aptitude are grounds for status demotion or dismissal (Article 28).
Q24 | Standards for status actions and discipline
Which is correct about Article 27 of the Local Public Service Act (地方公務員法) (standards for status actions and discipline)?
Employees can be disciplined only on grounds set out in the Local Public Service Act
Status actions and discipline may be taken at the appointing authority's discretion without regard to fairness
If an ordinance says so, employees can be dismissed against their will on grounds not in the Act
Each principal can freely add grounds for discipline in the school's internal rules
AnswerA. Employees can be disciplined only on grounds set out in the Local Public Service Act
Article 27(1) says all status actions and discipline must be fair; 27(2) says demotion or dismissal against the employee's will is only on grounds in the Act; and 27(3) says employees are disciplined only on grounds in the Act. Ordinances may set grounds for leave or salary downgrade, but grounds for involuntary dismissal come from the Act. Internal school rules cannot add grounds for discipline.
Q25 | Probationary employees
Which matches Article 29-2 of the Local Public Service Act (地方公務員法) about employees in their probationary period?
The disciplinary rules do not apply, so they cannot be disciplined
The service rules do not apply, so they have no duty of confidentiality
The status-action rules apply more fully, giving them more protection than formal employees
Part of the status-action rules, such as Article 28(1)–(3), does not apply to them
AnswerD. Part of the status-action rules, such as Article 28(1)–(3), does not apply to them
Article 29-2(1) says Articles 27(2), 28(1)–(3), 49(1)–(2) and the Administrative Appeal Act do not apply to probationary and temporarily appointed employees. Discipline (Article 29) and the service rules are not excluded, so they can be disciplined and do have a duty of confidentiality. Their status protection is weaker, not stronger.
Q26 | Disqualification and loss of post
Which is correct about Articles 16 and 28(4) of the Local Public Service Act (地方公務員法)?
Someone dismissed as discipline cannot become an employee of any local government until 5 years have passed
An employee who becomes disqualified keeps the post unless disciplinary action is taken
Someone dismissed as discipline by a local government cannot become its employee until 2 years have passed
Someone sentenced to detention (拘禁刑) or heavier is not disqualified if the sentence is suspended
AnswerC. Someone dismissed as discipline by a local government cannot become its employee until 2 years have passed
Article 16(ii) disqualifies anyone dismissed as discipline by that local government until 2 years have passed from that date; it is not "5 years" or "any local government". Article 28(4) says an employee who comes under Article 16 (except item ii) loses the post unless an ordinance provides otherwise, without any disciplinary action. Article 16(i) disqualifies anyone sentenced to detention or heavier until the sentence is served or no longer enforceable, which includes a suspended sentence period.
Q27 | Loss of license
For a public school teacher, in which case does the license lose effect under Article 10 of the Education Personnel Certification Act (教育職員免許法)?
When suspended as a disciplinary action
When dismissed as a disciplinary action
When dismissed as a status action because of a physical or mental disability
When dismissed as a status action because of surplus staff
AnswerB. When dismissed as a disciplinary action
Article 10(1) says a public school teacher's license loses effect on disciplinary dismissal, and on status dismissal under item 1 (poor performance) or item 3 (lack of aptitude) of Article 28(1) of the Local Public Service Act (地方公務員法). Suspension does not cause loss. Status dismissal for disability (item 2) or abolished posts/surplus staff (item 4) is not among these grounds.
Q28 | Training away from the workplace
Which matches Article 22(2) of the Act on Special Provisions concerning Educational Public Service Personnel (教育公務員特例法)?
Teachers may train away from their workplace on their own judgment, even if classes are affected
Teachers may not train away from their workplace unless ordered by the board of education
Teachers may train away from their workplace with parents' consent, as long as classes are not affected
Teachers may train away from their workplace with the approval of the head of their institution, as long as classes are not affected
AnswerD. Teachers may train away from their workplace with the approval of the head of their institution, as long as classes are not affected
Article 22(2) says teachers may carry out training away from their workplace with the approval of the head of their institution (the principal), as long as classes are not affected. It is not based only on the teacher's judgment or on parents' consent, and it does not require an order from the board of education.
Q29 | Induction training
Which is correct about induction training under Article 23 of the Act on Special Provisions concerning Educational Public Service Personnel (教育公務員特例法)?
It runs for 6 months from appointment, only at the board's training center, with no mentor teacher
It runs for 1 year in the third year after hiring, with a university lecturer from outside the school as mentor
Practical training runs for 1 year from appointment, with a mentor chosen from the school's staff
It runs for 2 years from appointment, only if the teacher wishes, with the principal as mentor
AnswerC. Practical training runs for 1 year from appointment, with a mentor chosen from the school's staff
Article 23(1) says the training provider must give teachers practical training on matters needed to perform their duties for one year from the date of appointment. Article 23(2) says a mentor teacher is assigned from among the deputy principal, vice-principal, senior teachers, advanced skill teachers, lead teachers, teachers or instructors at the trainee's school. The period is one year, the mentor comes from the school, and it is not optional.
Q30 | Mid-career training
Which is correct about mid-career teacher training under Article 24 of the Act on Special Provisions concerning Educational Public Service Personnel (教育公務員特例法)?
Each trainee's ability and aptitude are evaluated, and an individual training plan is drawn up from the results
Every teacher with 10 years of service receives identical training
It is given to teachers judged to teach inappropriately, to improve their teaching
It is a university-run course taken to renew the validity period of a license
AnswerA. Each trainee's ability and aptitude are evaluated, and an individual training plan is drawn up from the results
Article 24 covers training for mid-career teachers with considerable experience who are expected to play a core role in school operation. The adviser evaluates each trainee's ability and aptitude and draws up an individual plan based on the results, so it is not uniform. Training for teachers judged to teach inappropriately is the improvement training in Article 25. The license renewal system ended in July 2022.
Q31 | Improvement training
Which is correct about the length of improvement training (指導改善研修) under Article 25 of the Act on Special Provisions concerning Educational Public Service Personnel (教育公務員特例法)?
It must not exceed 6 months and can never be extended under any circumstances
It must not exceed 1 year, but if especially needed it can be extended up to 2 years in total from the start
It must not exceed 3 years, but can be extended any number of times if the teacher wishes
There is no time limit; it continues for years until improvement is recognized
AnswerB. It must not exceed 1 year, but if especially needed it can be extended up to 2 years in total from the start
Article 25(2) says improvement training must not exceed one year, and when especially needed the appointing authority may extend it, within two years in total from the start date. There is no rule of six months or three years, and there is a limit. Those still judged unable to teach properly after training face dismissal or other necessary measures (Article 25-2).
Q32 | Standards, plans and records
Which is correct about the Act on Special Provisions concerning Educational Public Service Personnel (教育公務員特例法) as amended in 2022?
Each teacher must draw up their own teacher training plan every year and submit it to the principal
Each principal sets the standards for the qualities of principals and teachers for their own school
The appointing authority must keep a record of training and similar activities for each principal and teacher
Training records need to be kept only if the teacher asks for one
AnswerC. The appointing authority must keep a record of training and similar activities for each principal and teacher
Article 22-5 says the appointing authority must keep a record of training and similar activities for each principal and teacher; it does not depend on the teacher's wishes. The standards are set by the appointing authority in light of national guidelines (Article 22-3), and the teacher training plan is set every year by the training provider based on those standards (Article 22-4). They are not set by principals or individual teachers.
Q33 | Graduate study leave
Which is correct about graduate study leave under Article 26 of the Act on Special Provisions concerning Educational Public Service Personnel (教育公務員特例法)?
To obtain a first-class license, a teacher may enroll in a junior college with the principal's permission, for up to 1 year
To obtain an advanced license, a teacher may enroll in graduate school just by notifying, with no time limit
A teacher still in the probationary period may enroll in graduate school with the appointing authority's permission, for up to 5 years
To obtain an advanced license, a teacher may enroll in graduate school with the appointing authority's permission, in units of years up to 3 years
AnswerD. To obtain an advanced license, a teacher may enroll in graduate school with the appointing authority's permission, in units of years up to 3 years
Article 26 lets teachers, with the appointing authority's permission, enroll in graduate programs to obtain an advanced (専修) license, for a period set in years and not exceeding three years. The aim is the advanced license, not first class; permission comes from the appointing authority, not the principal; and there is an upper limit. Teachers in the probationary period and some others are excluded.
Q34 | Teacher adjustment allowance
Which is correct about Article 3 of the Act on Special Measures concerning Salaries of Educational Personnel of Public Compulsory Education Schools, etc. (給特法)?
Teachers receive the adjustment allowance and also overtime pay based on their overtime hours
Teachers (excluding principals, deputy principals, vice-principals, etc.) receive the adjustment allowance, and no overtime or holiday pay
Only principals, deputy principals and vice-principals receive the adjustment allowance, not ordinary teachers
The adjustment allowance is paid only in months when the teacher applies, based on overtime hours
AnswerB. Teachers (excluding principals, deputy principals, vice-principals, etc.) receive the adjustment allowance, and no overtime or holiday pay
Article 3(1) says teaching staff other than principals, deputy principals, vice-principals and some others receive the teacher adjustment allowance, and Article 3(2) says teaching staff receive no overtime or holiday pay. So both are never paid together. Principals and similar posts are excluded. The allowance is a set percentage of the monthly salary, not paid according to overtime hours.
Q35 | The four overtime categories
Which is NOT one of the duties for which teachers may be ordered to work overtime under the cabinet order (the so-called four overtime categories)?
Writing class newsletters for parents
School events such as school trips
Staff meetings
Unavoidable work such as in a disaster
AnswerA. Writing class newsletters for parents
The cabinet order says teachers are, as a rule, not ordered to work overtime. Overtime may be ordered only for (1) off-campus or student practical training, (2) school events such as school trips, (3) staff meetings, and (4) work needed in unavoidable cases such as disasters or urgent student guidance, and only when there is a temporary or urgent unavoidable need. Writing class newsletters is not among these four.
Q36 | Adjustment allowance rate
After the 2025 amendment of the Act on Special Measures concerning Salaries of Educational Personnel of Public Compulsory Education Schools, etc. (給特法) (Act No. 68 of 2025), which is correct as of October 2026 about the adjustment allowance rate for elementary and junior high school teachers?
It was raised all at once to 10% of monthly salary in April 2026
It stays at 4% of monthly salary after the amendment, with other allowances added instead
It is 5% of monthly salary in 2026, rising 1 point each year to 10% from January 2031
It is 6% of monthly salary in 2026, reaching 10% from January 2028
AnswerC. It is 5% of monthly salary in 2026, rising 1 point each year to 10% from January 2031
The amended Article 3(1) sets the allowance at 10% of monthly salary (4% for kindergartens), and the supplementary provisions replace this with 5% for January–December 2026, 6% for 2027, 7% for 2028, 8% for 2029 and 9% for 2030. So it becomes 10% from January 2031. It did not jump to 10% at once, and it did not stay at 4%.
Practice: answer the questions on this page
This practice tool asks questions in random order (it works when JavaScript is enabled). You can still read all the questions and explanations above without it.
* The explanations are for study purposes. Always check the official guidelines of the local government whose exam you take. All questions are original. Laws are as of October 2026.
This page is a translation of the Japanese original. If the translation and the original differ, the Japanese version takes precedence. This translation was made with AI and may contain errors.Report a translation errorView the Japanese original