Which of the following is NOT a "school" as defined in Article 1 of the School Education Act (学校教育法)?
Compulsory education school (義務教育学校)
Specialized training college (専修学校)
Secondary education school (中等教育学校)
College of technology (高等専門学校)
AnswerB. Specialized training college (専修学校)
The answer is the specialized training college. Article 1 lists nine kinds of schools: kindergarten, elementary school, lower secondary school, compulsory education school, upper secondary school, secondary education school, special needs school, university and college of technology. Specialized training colleges are covered by other provisions of the Act but are not Article 1 schools. The other three options are all listed in Article 1.
Q2 | Who may establish schools
Under Article 2 of the School Education Act (学校教育法), which combination correctly lists who may establish schools?
The State, local governments and general incorporated associations
Only the State and prefectures
The State, local governments and religious corporations
The State, local governments and school corporations (学校法人)
AnswerD. The State, local governments and school corporations (学校法人)
The answer is the State, local governments and school corporations. Article 2 says only these three may establish schools. General incorporated associations and religious corporations are not included. Municipalities are also local governments, so "only the State and prefectures" is wrong; municipalities are in fact required to set up elementary schools.
Q3 | Tuition fees
Which statement about tuition fees under Article 6 of the School Education Act (学校教育法) is correct?
A private lower secondary school may charge tuition.
A national lower secondary school may charge tuition.
A public lower secondary school may charge tuition if parents agree.
Because it is compulsory education, a private elementary school may not charge tuition.
AnswerA. A private lower secondary school may charge tuition.
The correct statement is that a private lower secondary school may charge tuition. Article 6 allows schools to charge tuition, but national and public schools may not charge it for compulsory education. National schools are covered, so a national lower secondary school cannot charge tuition. Parental consent is not an exception. Private schools are not covered by the ban, so a private elementary school can charge tuition.
Q4 | Disqualifications
Which of the following is listed in Article 9 of the School Education Act (学校教育法) as a person who cannot become a principal or teacher?
A person sentenced to a fine
A person for whom 3 years have passed since their licence was revoked
A person sentenced to imprisonment (拘禁刑) or a heavier penalty
A person who does not hold Japanese nationality
AnswerC. A person sentenced to imprisonment (拘禁刑) or a heavier penalty
The answer is a person sentenced to imprisonment or heavier. Article 9 lists such persons, and persons whose licence lapsed or was revoked less than 3 years ago, among others. A fine is lighter than imprisonment and is not listed. Once 3 years have passed since revocation, the person is no longer disqualified. Nationality is not a ground in Article 9.
Q5 | A new teaching post
Which post was newly created in the School Education Act (学校教育法) by a 2025 amendment and took effect on 1 April 2026?
Shukan kyoyu (主幹教諭, senior teacher)
Shido kyoyu (指導教諭, advisory teacher)
Shumu kyoyu (主務教諭, coordinating teacher)
Vice-principal (副校長)
AnswerC. Shumu kyoyu (主務教諭, coordinating teacher)
The answer is the shumu kyoyu. The 2025 act amending the teachers' special salary law and related laws revised Article 37, creating a post that teaches pupils and coordinates staff on educational activities, effective 1 April 2026. Senior teachers, advisory teachers and vice-principals already existed before this amendment.
Q6 | Mandatory staff
Under Article 37(1) of the School Education Act (学校教育法), which combination lists the staff an elementary school must have?
Principal, deputy head (教頭), teachers, school nurse teacher (養護教諭), administrative staff
Principal, senior teacher (主幹教諭), teachers, school nurse teacher, administrative staff
Principal, deputy head (教頭), teachers, nutrition teacher, school librarian
AnswerA. Principal, deputy head (教頭), teachers, school nurse teacher (養護教諭), administrative staff
The answer is principal, deputy head (教頭), teachers, school nurse teacher and administrative staff. Article 37(1) makes these five mandatory. The vice-principal (副校長), senior teacher and nutrition teacher are posts that "may" be placed under paragraph 2. School librarians are not an Article 37 post. Article 49 applies the same rule to lower secondary schools.
Q7 | Purpose of lower secondary school
Which is the purpose of lower secondary school (中学校) under Article 45 of the School Education Act (学校教育法)?
To provide the basic part of general education as compulsory education, according to mental and physical development.
To provide general education as compulsory education consistently from the basic level, according to mental and physical development.
To provide advanced general and specialized education according to development and career paths.
To provide general education as compulsory education, building on elementary education, according to mental and physical development.
AnswerD. To provide general education as compulsory education, building on elementary education, according to mental and physical development.
The answer is 'building on elementary school education ... general education'. 'The basic part of general education' is the purpose of elementary school (Article 29), 'consistently from the basic level' is that of the compulsory education school (Article 49-2), and 'advanced general and specialized education' is that of upper secondary school (Article 50). Remember: elementary school gives the "basic" part; lower secondary school builds "on the foundation of elementary education".
Q8 | Educational goals compared
Which comparison of the goal provisions for elementary school (Article 30(1)) and lower secondary school (Article 46) is correct?
Lower secondary school has its own ten goals separate from Article 21.
Elementary school has the qualifier "to the extent necessary"; the lower secondary provision does not.
Only the lower secondary provision has the qualifier "to the extent necessary".
Lower secondary education applies the goals of upper secondary school.
AnswerB. Elementary school has the qualifier "to the extent necessary"; the lower secondary provision does not.
The correct statement is that only the elementary school provision has the qualifier 'to the extent necessary'. Article 30(1) says elementary education achieves the Article 21 goals "to the extent necessary" for its purpose; Article 46 says lower secondary education achieves the Article 21 goals for its purpose, with no such qualifier. Both use Article 21 (goals of compulsory education); there are no separate ten goals for lower secondary school. The qualifier is in the elementary provision. Upper secondary goals are not applied.
Q9 | Unit lesson time
Under the tables of the Enforcement Regulations of the School Education Act (学校教育法施行規則), how long is one unit lesson in lower secondary school?
50 minutes
45 minutes
60 minutes
40 minutes
AnswerA. 50 minutes
The answer is 50 minutes (notes to Appended Table 2). 45 minutes is the unit for elementary school (Appended Table 1). There is no 60- or 40-minute rule. The total annual lesson hours are 1,015 units for every lower secondary grade and for elementary grades 4 to 6.
Q10 | Lower secondary curriculum
Which is NOT part of the lower secondary curriculum under Article 72 of the Enforcement Regulations of the School Education Act (学校教育法施行規則)?
Moral education as a special subject (特別の教科 道徳)
Period for integrated studies (総合的な学習の時間)
Foreign language activities (外国語活動)
Special activities (特別活動)
AnswerC. Foreign language activities (外国語活動)
The answer is foreign language activities. Article 72 builds the lower secondary curriculum from subjects (including foreign language), moral education as a special subject, the period for integrated studies and special activities. Foreign language activities exist only in the elementary curriculum (Article 50), in grades 3 and 4.
Q11 | Years of compulsory education
Under Article 16 of the School Education Act (学校教育法), how many years of general education must guardians have their children receive?
6 years
9 years
10 years
12 years
AnswerB. 9 years
The answer is 9 years. Article 16 states that guardians are obliged to have their children receive nine years of general education. Six years is the length of elementary school and 12 years is the total through upper secondary school; there is no 10-year rule. The Basic Act on Education (教育基本法) Article 5 leaves the details to another law, which is the School Education Act.
Q12 | Start and end of the duty
Under Article 17(1) of the School Education Act (学校教育法), which correctly states the period of the duty to send a child to elementary school?
From the day the child turns 6 to the day the child turns 12
From the start of the school year in which the child turns 6 to the start of the school year in which the child turns 12
From the start of the first school year after the child turns 7, to the day the child turns 13
From the start of the first school year after the day the child turns 6, to the end of the school year in which the child turns 12
AnswerD. From the start of the first school year after the day the child turns 6, to the end of the school year in which the child turns 12
The correct period, from the first school year after the day the child turns 6 to the end of the school year in which the child turns 12, matches the wording of Article 17(1). The duty does not run from the birthday itself, does not end at the start of a school year, and does not begin at age 7. The school year runs from 1 April to 31 March (Enforcement Regulations Article 59).
Q13 | Unfinished elementary course
For a child who has not completed the elementary course by the end of the school year in which they turn 12, what does the proviso to Article 17(1) say?
All attendance duties end at the end of the school year in which the child turns 12.
The child must be sent to lower secondary school from the next school year even without completion.
The duty to send the child to elementary school continues until the end of the school year in which the child turns 18.
The duty to send the child to elementary school continues until the end of the school year in which the child turns 15.
AnswerD. The duty to send the child to elementary school continues until the end of the school year in which the child turns 15.
The correct statement is that the duty extends to the end of the school year in which the child turns 15. The duty does not simply end at 12, and the lower secondary duty starts only after the elementary course is completed (Article 17(2)). There is no age-18 rule.
Q14 | Postponement and exemption
Who may postpone or exempt the attendance duty for a child found unable to attend school due to illness, developmental delay or other unavoidable reasons?
The principal of the school the child would attend
The municipal board of education
The prefectural governor
The Minister of Education (文部科学大臣)
AnswerB. The municipal board of education
The answer is the municipal board of education (Article 18), following rules set by the Minister. Principals and governors do not have this power. The Minister sets the rules but does not decide individual cases.
Q15 | Financial assistance
Which statement correctly describes Article 19 of the School Education Act (学校教育法) on school attendance assistance?
Municipalities must give necessary assistance to guardians of school-age children who find attendance difficult for financial reasons.
If attendance is found difficult for financial reasons, the municipal board of education exempts the guardian from the attendance duty.
Assistance to guardians of school-age children facing financial difficulty is given by prefectures, not municipalities.
Municipalities need only make efforts to give assistance in such cases.
AnswerA. Municipalities must give necessary assistance to guardians of school-age children who find attendance difficult for financial reasons.
The correct statement, that municipalities must give the necessary assistance, follows the wording of Article 19. Financial hardship is not a ground for postponement or exemption under Article 18. The assistance is given by municipalities, and it is a duty ("must"), not merely an effort obligation.
Q16 | Goals of compulsory education
Which is one of the goals of compulsory education in Article 21 of the School Education Act (学校教育法)?
To familiarize pupils with a foreign language and make sure they acquire everyday conversation skills in it.
To make sure pupils acquire the advanced specialized knowledge and skills needed for future jobs.
To familiarize pupils with reading and develop basic abilities to correctly understand and use the Japanese language needed in daily life.
To help pupils understand local industries and foster willingness to take jobs in them.
AnswerC. To familiarize pupils with reading and develop basic abilities to correctly understand and use the Japanese language needed in daily life.
The correct answer, reading and the basic ability to understand and use Japanese, is Article 21 item 5. Article 21 item 3 mentions respecting other countries through understanding foreign cultures, but no item sets foreign-language conversation as a goal. Advanced specialized knowledge is not a compulsory-education goal. Item 10 covers basic knowledge and skills about occupations and the ability to choose one's future path, not jobs in a specific industry.
Q17 | Notice of entry date
Which statement about the notice of school entry date under Article 5 of the Enforcement Order of the School Education Act (学校教育法施行令) is correct?
The municipal board of education notifies guardians at least 2 months before the start of the next school year.
The principal of the school notifies guardians at least 1 month before the start of the next school year.
The prefectural board of education notifies guardians at least 3 months before the start of the next school year.
The mayor notifies the child at least 2 months before the start of the next school year.
AnswerA. The municipal board of education notifies guardians at least 2 months before the start of the next school year.
The correct statement is that the municipal board notifies guardians 2 months before the school year. Under Article 5, the municipal board of education notifies the guardians of children due to enter school of the entry date by 2 months before the next school year and, where there are two or more schools, designates the school. It is not the principal or the mayor, and the notice goes to the guardian, not the child. The prefectural board notifies in the case of special needs schools (Article 14).
Q18 | Reporting absence
Under Article 20 of the Enforcement Order of the School Education Act (学校教育法施行令), what absence triggers the principal's notice to the municipal board of education?
Absence for 3 consecutive days, excluding school holidays, and similar cases
Absence for a total of 30 days or more in a school year, and similar cases
Absence for 14 consecutive days, including school holidays, and similar cases
Absence for 7 consecutive days, excluding school holidays, and similar cases
AnswerD. Absence for 7 consecutive days, excluding school holidays, and similar cases
The answer is 7 consecutive days excluding holidays. Article 20 requires the principal to notify the municipal board promptly when a school-age pupil has been absent for 7 consecutive days excluding holidays, or attendance is otherwise poor, and the guardian has no valid reason. The 30-day figure is a guideline used in surveys of long-term non-attendance and is unrelated to this rule. There is no 3- or 14-day rule.
Q19 | Pre-school-entry health check
Under Article 11 of the School Health and Safety Act (学校保健安全法), who conducts the health check for children due to enter elementary school the next school year?
The principal of the elementary school the child will enter
The prefectural board of education
The municipal board of education
The head of the public health centre
AnswerC. The municipal board of education
The answer is the municipal board of education. Article 11 requires it to carry out the check, and Article 12 requires follow-up measures such as recommending treatment and guidance on postponement, exemption or special needs school enrolment. Regular health checks of enrolled pupils are done by schools and are a different system.
Q20 | Children of foreign nationality
According to MEXT, which statement about foreign-national children attending public elementary and lower secondary schools is correct?
Their guardians have the same attendance duty as Japanese guardians and receive reminders if they breach it.
They have no attendance duty, but if they wish they are accepted and treated like Japanese pupils, with no tuition and free textbooks.
They have no attendance duty and are accepted if they wish, but unlike Japanese pupils they are charged tuition.
Because they have no attendance duty, they are not accepted in public schools and must attend foreign schools.
AnswerB. They have no attendance duty, but if they wish they are accepted and treated like Japanese pupils, with no tuition and free textbooks.
The correct statement is that there is no attendance duty, but children are accepted and treated like Japanese pupils. MEXT explains that foreign nationals have no legal attendance duty, but if guardians wish, their children are accepted in public compulsory-education schools and treated the same as Japanese pupils, including no tuition and free textbooks. The other three options are all wrong.
Q21 | Duty to use textbooks
Under Article 34(1) of the School Education Act (学校教育法), what textbooks must an elementary school use?
Textbooks produced by the prefectural board of education
Textbooks approved by the Minister of Education or textbooks authored by MEXT
Books chosen by the principal from commercially available books
Only textbooks approved by the Minister (MEXT-authored books excluded)
AnswerB. Textbooks approved by the Minister of Education or textbooks authored by MEXT
The correct answer is textbooks authorized by the Minister or authored by MEXT. Article 34(1) requires the use of textbooks that passed the Minister's authorization or are authored by MEXT; Article 49 applies this to lower secondary schools. Books made by a prefectural board or chosen by the principal from the market are not textbooks. MEXT-authored books are included.
Q22 | Textbook adoption
According to MEXT, which statement about textbook adoption (採択) is correct?
For public schools the board of education that runs them has adoption authority; for national and private schools the principal does.
The principal of each school, whether national, public or private, has authority to adopt its own textbooks.
The Minister of Education, who authorizes textbooks, adopts them uniformly for all schools nationwide.
Each homeroom teacher, who knows the class best, adopts the textbooks used in the class.
AnswerA. For public schools the board of education that runs them has adoption authority; for national and private schools the principal does.
The correct statement is that boards of education adopt for public schools and principals for national and private schools. MEXT explains that the competent board of education adopts textbooks for public schools, and the principal does so for national and private schools. Compulsory-education textbooks are adopted per subject within adoption districts and, in principle, kept for four years. The Minister authorizes textbooks but does not adopt them, and teachers do not adopt them.
Q23 | Discipline and corporal punishment
Which statement correctly describes Article 11 of the School Education Act (学校教育法)?
Teachers may not discipline pupils; only the principal may discipline them when educationally necessary.
Corporal punishment is allowed if educationally necessary and the guardian agrees.
Principals and teachers may discipline pupils when educationally necessary, but may not use corporal punishment.
Only the municipal board of education that runs the school may discipline pupils.
AnswerC. Principals and teachers may discipline pupils when educationally necessary, but may not use corporal punishment.
The correct statement is that principals and teachers may discipline but may not use corporal punishment. Article 11 lets principals and teachers discipline pupils when educationally necessary, under the Minister's rules, but its proviso bans corporal punishment. Teachers can discipline too (formal expulsion, suspension and reprimand are imposed by the principal). Parental consent never permits corporal punishment, and the board of education is not the actor under Article 11.
Q24 | Who imposes formal sanctions
Under Article 26 of the Enforcement Regulations of the School Education Act (学校教育法施行規則), who imposes expulsion, suspension and reprimand (excluding universities)?
The homeroom teacher
The municipal board of education
The deputy head (教頭)
The principal
AnswerD. The principal
The answer is the principal (Article 26(2)). Teachers can give informal discipline such as scolding, but these formal sanctions are imposed by the principal. The municipal board of education orders attendance suspension (出席停止) under Article 35 of the Act, which is a different measure.
Q25 | Limits on expulsion and suspension
Which statement about sanctions on school-age pupils under Article 26 of the Enforcement Regulations of the School Education Act (学校教育法施行規則) is correct?
A municipal lower secondary school can expel a school-age pupil whose conduct shows no prospect of improvement.
A private lower secondary school can suspend a school-age pupil.
Even a private lower secondary school cannot suspend a school-age pupil.
A reprimand cannot be given to a school-age pupil at a national elementary school.
AnswerC. Even a private lower secondary school cannot suspend a school-age pupil.
The correct statement is that even a private lower secondary school cannot suspend a school-age pupil. Under paragraph 4, suspension cannot be imposed on school-age pupils at any school, national, public or private. Expulsion cannot be imposed on school-age pupils at municipal elementary, lower secondary (except combined-type) and compulsory education schools, or at public special needs schools (paragraph 3), so a municipal lower secondary school cannot expel a school-age pupil. Reprimands have no such restriction.
Q26 | How corporal punishment is judged
According to the MEXT notice of 13 March 2013, how is it judged whether a disciplinary act is corporal punishment?
By considering age, health, development, the place and time, and the form of discipline comprehensively and objectively, case by case.
Only by whether the pupil complained of physical or mental pain.
It is not corporal punishment if the teacher had an educational intention or guidance purpose.
It is not corporal punishment if the guardian agreed in advance and left matters to the school.
AnswerA. By considering age, health, development, the place and time, and the form of discipline comprehensively and objectively, case by case.
The correct statement is to judge each case comprehensively and objectively. The notice says to consider these conditions comprehensively and objectively, not just the subjective views of teachers, pupils or guardians, and to judge each case. If the act invades the body or causes physical pain, it is corporal punishment. The pupil's complaint alone, the teacher's intention or parental consent do not decide it.
Q27 | Acceptable discipline
In light of the MEXT notice and the Guide to Student Guidance (生徒指導提要), which act is normally acceptable as discipline as long as it causes no physical pain?
Making a pupil sit formally (seiza) for a long time
Keeping a pupil in the classroom after school for guidance
Slapping a pupil's cheek to make them reflect
Imposing persistent, excessive exercise on one particular club member
AnswerB. Keeping a pupil in the classroom after school for guidance
The answer is keeping the pupil after school. The notice treats warnings, scolding, staying after school, guidance in another room, standing, homework, cleaning and extra duties as normally within disciplinary authority if they cause no physical pain. Long seiza causes physical pain and slapping invades the body, so both are corporal punishment. The Guide says persistent, excessive burdens on a particular club member are not educational guidance.
Q28 | Self-defence
A teacher attacked by a pupil unavoidably grabs the pupil's arm in self-defence. How is this treated under the MEXT notice?
It always counts as corporal punishment because the teacher touched the pupil.
It is corporal punishment as a form of discipline, but no sanction applies.
It is corporal punishment unless the teacher is the homeroom teacher.
It is self-defence or a justified act and is not corporal punishment.
AnswerD. It is self-defence or a justified act and is not corporal punishment.
The correct statement is that it is not corporal punishment, as self-defence or a justifiable act. The notice says unavoidable physical force used to defend against a pupil's violence is not educational discipline and is not corporal punishment, even if it causes bodily harm or pain. The same applies to unavoidably stopping violence against other pupils. Touching alone does not make it corporal punishment, and whether the teacher is the homeroom teacher does not matter.
Q29 | Attendance suspension
Which statement about attendance suspension (出席停止) under Article 35 of the School Education Act (学校教育法) is correct?
The municipal board of education orders it, addressed to the guardian of a pupil whose bad conduct hinders other pupils' education.
The principal orders it as a form of discipline, addressed to the pupil whose bad conduct hinders others' education.
The prefectural board of education orders it against the pupil after a report from the municipal board.
The homeroom teacher orders it on the spot against a pupil who disrupted lessons or other educational activities.
AnswerA. The municipal board of education orders it, addressed to the guardian of a pupil whose bad conduct hinders other pupils' education.
The correct statement is that the municipal board of education orders the guardian. Article 35 lets the municipal board of education order the guardian to suspend the attendance of a pupil who, for example, repeatedly harms others or disrupts lessons and hinders others' education. The board must hear the guardian first, give a written notice of reasons and period, and support the pupil's learning during the suspension. It is not discipline, and it is not ordered by the principal, the prefectural board or the teacher.
Q30 | Suspension for infection
Under Article 19 of the School Health and Safety Act (学校保健安全法), who may suspend the attendance of a pupil who has, or may have, an infectious disease?
The municipal board of education
The principal
The school doctor
The head of the public health centre
AnswerB. The principal
The answer is the principal. Article 19 allows the principal to suspend attendance of pupils who have, are suspected of having, or may contract an infectious disease, as set out by cabinet order. Suspension for bad conduct under Article 35 of the School Education Act is ordered by the municipal board of education; do not confuse the two. School doctors and public health centre heads are not given this power.
Practice: answer the questions on this page
This practice tool asks questions in random order (it works when JavaScript is enabled). You can still read all the questions and explanations above without it.
* The explanations are for study purposes. Always check the official guidelines of the local government whose exam you take. All questions are original. Laws are as of October 2026.
This page is a translation of the Japanese original. If the translation and the original differ, the Japanese version takes precedence. This translation was made with AI and may contain errors.Report a translation errorView the Japanese original