Karinoya Learning Room

Qualifications · Teacher Employment Exam: Pedagogy & General Knowledge Lab

Special Needs Education and Inclusive Education

Read the questions and explanations in English. The lectures (explanatory articles) are available in Japanese only.

View the Japanese version (with lectures) →

Q1 | Target groups of special needs schools

Which combination correctly lists the disability categories that Article 72 of the School Education Act (学校教育法) names as the target of special needs schools?

  1. Persons with visual impairments, hearing impairments, intellectual disabilities, physical disabilities, and health impairments (including the physically weak)
  2. Persons with visual impairments, hearing impairments, intellectual disabilities, autism, and learning disabilities
  3. Persons with intellectual disabilities, emotional disturbances, speech and language impairments, physical disabilities, and health impairments
  4. Persons with visual impairments, hearing impairments, physical disabilities, ADHD, and health impairments
AnswerA. Persons with visual impairments, hearing impairments, intellectual disabilities, physical disabilities, and health impairments (including the physically weak)

Article 72 names five groups: visual impairments, hearing impairments, intellectual disabilities, physical disabilities, and health impairments (including the physically weak). Autism, learning disabilities, ADHD, emotional disturbances, and speech and language impairments are categories listed in Article 140 of the Enforcement Regulations for resource-room instruction (通級による指導), not the five groups of Article 72.

Q2 | Target groups of special needs classes

Which disability category is expressly listed in the items of Article 81(2) of the School Education Act (学校教育法) as a target of special needs classes?

  1. Persons with learning disabilities
  2. Persons who are hard of hearing
  3. Persons with ADHD
  4. Persons with speech and language impairments
AnswerB. Persons who are hard of hearing

The items of Article 81(2) are: intellectual disabilities, physical disabilities, the physically weak, low vision, hard of hearing, and others for whom education in a special needs class is appropriate. Hard of hearing is item 5. Learning disabilities, ADHD, and speech and language impairments are categories in Article 140 of the Enforcement Regulations (resource-room instruction), not items of Article 81(2); special needs classes for speech and language impairments are set up under the "others" item.

Q3 | Who is eligible for resource-room instruction

Which of the following is NOT listed in the items of Article 140 of the Enforcement Regulations for the School Education Act (学校教育法施行規則) as eligible for resource-room instruction (通級による指導)?

  1. Persons with autism
  2. Persons with emotional disturbances
  3. Persons with intellectual disabilities
  4. Persons with learning disabilities
AnswerC. Persons with intellectual disabilities

Article 140 lists eight items: speech and language impairments, autism, emotional disturbances, low vision, hard of hearing, learning disabilities, ADHD, and others with disabilities. Intellectual disabilities are not included; for these children, special needs classes (School Education Act Article 81(2)(i)) and special needs schools are the expected settings. Autism, emotional disturbances, and learning disabilities are all listed in Article 140.

Q4 | Standard hours of resource-room instruction

Which statement about the standard number of class hours for resource-room instruction (通級による指導) is correct?

  1. 10 to 280 unit hours a year regardless of the type of disability
  2. 35 to 140 unit hours a year; at least 70 unit hours a year for learning disabilities and ADHD
  3. At least half of the weekly class hours as a guide, with no upper limit
  4. 35 to 280 unit hours a year; 10 to 280 unit hours a year for learning disabilities and ADHD
AnswerD. 35 to 280 unit hours a year; 10 to 280 unit hours a year for learning disabilities and ADHD

Ministry of Education Notice No. 7 of 1993 sets the standard at 35 to 280 unit hours a year, and 10 to 280 unit hours a year for students with learning disabilities or ADHD. Because the lower limit differs by disability, "10 to 280 regardless of disability" is wrong. The upper limit is 280, not 140. "At least half of the weekly class hours" comes from the 2022 notice on how much time students in special needs classes should spend in that class, not from the rules on resource-room hours.

Q5 | Special needs classes and resource-room instruction

Which statement about students enrolled in special needs classes and resource-room instruction (通級による指導) is correct?

  1. Students in special needs classes must receive resource-room instruction if their parents request it
  2. Article 140 of the Enforcement Regulations excludes students in special needs classes, so they are not eligible for resource-room instruction
  3. Students in special needs classes must receive resource-room instruction for at least half of the week
  4. Students in special needs classes may receive resource-room instruction only at another school
AnswerB. Article 140 of the Enforcement Regulations excludes students in special needs classes, so they are not eligible for resource-room instruction

Article 140 of the Enforcement Regulations for the School Education Act (学校教育法施行規則) expressly excludes "students in special needs classes". Resource-room instruction is for students enrolled in regular classes, so students in special needs classes are not eligible. There is no rule making it mandatory at parents' request, requiring half of the week, or allowing it only at another school.

Q6 | Instruction at another school

A child receives resource-room instruction at an elementary school other than the one in which the child is enrolled. Which statement is correct?

  1. Classes taken at the other school can never be counted toward the home school's class hours
  2. A child who receives instruction at another school must transfer to that school
  3. Classes at the other school are not counted as absences only when the municipal board of education approves
  4. The principal may treat the classes taken at the other school as classes of the home school's special curriculum
AnswerD. The principal may treat the classes taken at the other school as classes of the home school's special curriculum

Article 141 of the Enforcement Regulations for the School Education Act (学校教育法施行規則) allows the principal to treat classes taken at another school, as set by the school's founder, as classes of the home school's special curriculum. So the idea that they cannot be counted is wrong. No transfer is required, and there is no rule tying attendance to board approval.

Q7 | Size of special needs classes

Under Article 3(2) of the Act on the Standards for Class Formation and Fixed Number of School Personnel of Public Compulsory Education Schools (義務標準法), what is the standard number of students per special needs class in public elementary and lower secondary schools?

  1. 8 for both elementary and lower secondary schools
  2. 8 for elementary and 6 for lower secondary schools
  3. 12 for both elementary and lower secondary schools
  4. 6 for elementary and 8 for lower secondary schools
AnswerA. 8 for both elementary and lower secondary schools

The table in Article 3(2) sets the standard at 8 students per special needs class for both elementary and lower secondary schools. Options with different numbers for the two school levels, or with 12, do not match the table. This is a standard; a prefectural board of education may set a smaller number when it finds it especially necessary.

Q8 | Curriculum of special needs classes

According to the General Provisions of the Elementary and Lower Secondary School Courses of Study (学習指導要領), which statement about the special curriculum of special needs classes is correct?

  1. It must be the same as the regular class curriculum, and subject goals and content cannot be replaced
  2. Independence activities belong only to special needs schools, so they are not part of special needs classes
  3. It incorporates independence activities and may replace subject goals and content with those of a lower grade
  4. As an exception, subject goals and content may only be replaced with those of a higher grade
AnswerC. It incorporates independence activities and may replace subject goals and content with those of a lower grade

Section 4-2(1)(b) of Chapter 1 says the special curriculum should incorporate independence activities (自立活動) to overcome difficulties caused by disability, and may replace subject goals and content with those of a lower grade, or with the subjects of special needs schools for students with intellectual disabilities. Requiring the same curriculum, excluding independence activities, or allowing only higher-grade content all contradict the General Provisions. The rule is the same for elementary and lower secondary schools.

Q9 | Two individual plans

Which statement about the individualized education support plan (個別の教育支援計画) and the individualized teaching plan (個別の指導計画) matches the General Provisions of the Elementary and Lower Secondary School Courses of Study?

  1. The individualized education support plan is prepared only at special needs schools, not at elementary or lower secondary schools
  2. For every child with a disability in a regular class, the law requires both plans to be prepared
  3. For children in special needs classes and children receiving resource-room instruction, both plans are prepared and used
  4. The individualized teaching plan is prepared by parents and submitted to the school at the start of the year
AnswerC. For children in special needs classes and children receiving resource-room instruction, both plans are prepared and used

Section 4-2(1)(d) of Chapter 1 asks schools to "endeavor" to prepare both plans for children with disabilities, and then states that for children in special needs classes and those receiving resource-room instruction, both plans "shall be prepared and used effectively". Elementary and lower secondary schools do prepare them, so "special needs schools only" is wrong. For children in regular classes in general, preparation is an effort, not a legal requirement. The school, not the parents, prepares the plans.

Q10 | The 2022 notice on special needs classes

Which statement matches the April 2022 MEXT notice "On the Appropriate Operation of Special Needs Classes and Resource-Room Instruction" (特別支援学級及び通級による指導の適切な運用について)?

  1. Students in special needs classes should, in principle, be taught in the special needs class for at least half of the weekly class hours as a guide
  2. Students in special needs classes should spend at least half of the weekly class hours in regular classes to emphasize exchange
  3. Where resource-room instruction is hard to arrange, it is desirable to open a special needs class instead
  4. It is desirable not to set aside time for independence activities in special needs classes
AnswerA. Students in special needs classes should, in principle, be taught in the special needs class for at least half of the weekly class hours as a guide

The notice says students in special needs classes should, in principle, be taught in the special needs class for at least half of the weekly class hours as a guide, and that focusing only on "exchange" is not appropriate. Spending half in regular classes is the reverse. Opening a special needs class simply because resource-room instruction is hard to arrange is described as inappropriate. Schools whose special curriculum lacks independence activities are asked to review it.

Q11 | The center function of special needs schools

Which role does Article 74 of the School Education Act (学校教育法) give to special needs schools?

  1. To appoint and assign the homeroom teachers of special needs classes in local schools
  2. To make the final decision on school placement for children with disabilities in local schools
  3. To prepare the individualized teaching plans of local schools on their behalf
  4. To endeavor to give necessary advice or assistance at the request of elementary and lower secondary schools, among others
AnswerD. To endeavor to give necessary advice or assistance at the request of elementary and lower secondary schools, among others

Article 74 says special needs schools shall endeavor to provide necessary advice or assistance, at the request of kindergartens, elementary, lower secondary, and other schools, on the education of children with disabilities. This is called the center function. Appointing teachers is the authority of the appointing body (the board of education). School placement is decided by the municipal board of education. Individualized teaching plans are prepared by the school the child attends.

Q12 | Who must establish special needs schools

Under Article 80 of the School Education Act (学校教育法), which body is required to establish special needs schools?

  1. Municipalities
  2. Prefectures
  3. The national government
  4. School corporations
AnswerB. Prefectures

Article 80 requires prefectures to establish the special needs schools needed for school-age children in their area who have visual impairments or other disabilities of the degree set by Cabinet Order. Do not confuse this with the duty of municipalities to establish elementary and lower secondary schools (Articles 38 and 49). The national government and school corporations may also set up special needs schools, but they are not the bodies bound by Article 80.

Q13 | What resource-room instruction teaches

Which statement about the content of resource-room instruction (通級による指導) is correct?

  1. It is given as remedial lessons to make up for delays in subjects
  2. It repeats the same content as the regular class once more in a small group
  3. It does not refer to independence activities and follows only subject goals
  4. It corresponds to independence activities and should not become mere remedial teaching of subjects
AnswerD. It corresponds to independence activities and should not become mere remedial teaching of subjects

Resource-room instruction aims to improve or overcome learning and daily-life difficulties caused by disability and corresponds to the independence activities (自立活動) of special needs schools. Subject content may be handled when especially necessary, but it must not become mere remedial teaching. The General Provisions also say goals and content are set with reference to independence activities. The other options contradict this.

Q14 | Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

Which statement about Japan and the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (障害者の権利に関する条約) is correct?

  1. Japan signed and ratified it at the same time in 2006
  2. Japan signed it but had not ratified it as of October 2026
  3. Japan signed it in September 2007 and ratified it in January 2014
  4. Japan ratified it in April 2016 and enforced the Act for Eliminating Discrimination against Persons with Disabilities at the same time
AnswerC. Japan signed it in September 2007 and ratified it in January 2014

MEXT's Guide on Educational Support for Children with Disabilities states that Japan signed the convention in September 2007 and ratified it in January 2014. Ratification did not come at signing; about six years passed between the two. April 2016 is when the Act for Eliminating Discrimination against Persons with Disabilities (障害者差別解消法) took effect, not when Japan ratified the convention.

Q15 | Definition of reasonable accommodation

Which description matches "reasonable accommodation" (合理的配慮) in schools as defined in the July 2012 report of the Elementary and Secondary Education Subcommittee of the Central Council for Education?

  1. A nationally uniform list of accommodations set by the government that schools must carry out as written
  2. Changes and adjustments the school founder and school make for what a child individually needs, within limits that impose no undue burden
  3. Support that parents of a child with a disability pay for and arrange in place of the school
  4. Advance improvements of the environment for an unspecified number of children, such as making facilities barrier-free
AnswerB. Changes and adjustments the school founder and school make for what a child individually needs, within limits that impose no undue burden

The report defines reasonable accommodation as necessary and appropriate changes and adjustments by the school founder and the school, needed individually by a child, to ensure that the child can enjoy the right to education equally with others, without a disproportionate or undue burden in terms of systems or finances. It is decided case by case, not from a national list, and it is not paid for by parents. Environment improvements for an unspecified number of children are "basic environmental improvements" (基礎的環境整備), which are distinct from reasonable accommodation.

Q16 | Basic environmental improvements

Which statement correctly describes the relationship between "basic environmental improvements" (基礎的環境整備) and "reasonable accommodation" (合理的配慮)?

  1. Basic environmental improvements are the foundation, and reasonable accommodation is provided individually in light of them
  2. Schools need not provide reasonable accommodation until all basic environmental improvements are completed
  3. Basic environmental improvements respond to individual requests, while reasonable accommodation is made without waiting for them
  4. The two terms mean the same thing and are simply called differently depending on the situation
AnswerA. Basic environmental improvements are the foundation, and reasonable accommodation is provided individually in light of them

The MEXT guide calls the environment improvements that underlie reasonable accommodation "basic environmental improvements", and says reasonable accommodation is provided individually based on their status. The MEXT guidelines add that environment improvements proceed without waiting for individual requests, while reasonable accommodation responds to individual requests, and that both should proceed in parallel. So "not needed until completed", the reversed version, and "same meaning" are all wrong.

Q17 | Enforcement and amendment of the Act

Which statement about the enforcement and amendment of the Act for Eliminating Discrimination against Persons with Disabilities (障害者差別解消法) is correct?

  1. It took effect on April 1, 2016; a 2021 amendment made reasonable accommodation by businesses mandatory, effective April 1, 2024
  2. It took effect on April 1, 2013, and reasonable accommodation was mandatory for everyone, including businesses, from the start
  3. It took effect on April 1, 2016, and from April 1, 2024 reasonable accommodation by government bodies became only an effort obligation
  4. It took effect on April 1, 2021, and reasonable accommodation by businesses was still only an effort obligation as of October 2026
AnswerA. It took effect on April 1, 2016; a 2021 amendment made reasonable accommodation by businesses mandatory, effective April 1, 2024

According to the Cabinet Office, the Act took effect on April 1, 2016, was amended in May 2021 (Act No. 56 of 2021), and the amendment took effect on April 1, 2024, turning reasonable accommodation by businesses from an effort obligation into a legal obligation. The Act was enacted in 2013 but took effect in 2016. For government bodies, it has been mandatory from the start and was never reduced to an effort obligation.

Q18 | Public and private schools

Under the Act for Eliminating Discrimination against Persons with Disabilities (障害者差別解消法) as of October 2026, which statement about public and private schools is correct?

  1. Only public schools are covered; even the ban on unjust discriminatory treatment does not apply to private schools
  2. Public schools must provide reasonable accommodation, but private schools still have only an effort obligation
  3. Public schools are "government bodies" and private schools are "businesses"; both must provide reasonable accommodation
  4. Private schools must provide reasonable accommodation, but public schools still have only an effort obligation
AnswerC. Public schools are "government bodies" and private schools are "businesses"; both must provide reasonable accommodation

The Act treats national and local governments as "government bodies" (Article 7) and others conducting business as "businesses" (Article 8). Public schools set up by local governments fall under the former; private schools run by school corporations fall under the latter. Both Articles 7 and 8 prohibit unjust discriminatory treatment and require reasonable accommodation ("shall"). For private schools, it was an effort obligation until March 2024 and became mandatory on April 1, 2024.

Q19 | Responding to a request for accommodation

A public lower secondary school student with a learning disability asks for test questions to be read aloud and for extra time in regular exams. Which response fits the Act for Eliminating Discrimination against Persons with Disabilities (障害者差別解消法) and MEXT's guidelines?

  1. Refuse across the board for fairness, because conditions would differ from other students
  2. Do not consider anything at all until a doctor's certificate is submitted
  3. Say it will be considered next year because there is no precedent, and refuse this time
  4. Hold a constructive dialogue with the student and parents and consider feasible methods
AnswerD. Hold a constructive dialogue with the student and parents and consider feasible methods

Reasonable accommodation is provided after a request, within limits that do not impose an undue burden. MEXT's guidelines call for mutual understanding through constructive dialogue and list extra test time and reading aloud as examples of accommodation in schools. Refusing "for fairness" or "because there is no precedent" means refusing without considering the burden, which does not fit the Act. There is no rule that nothing can be considered without a medical certificate.

Q20 | Judging undue burden

Which of the following is listed in MEXT's guidelines as a factor in judging whether a reasonable accommodation imposes an "undue burden"?

  1. Whether other parents in the class agree
  2. The degree of cost and burden
  3. Whether there is a precedent
  4. How many years of experience the teacher in charge has
AnswerB. The degree of cost and burden

The guidelines say undue burden is judged case by case, considering the impact on the work or business, feasibility, the degree of cost and burden, the size of the organization, and its financial situation. Other parents' opinions, precedent, and a teacher's years of experience are not factors in the guidelines, and refusing on those grounds alone is not appropriate.

Q21 | Deciding school placement

Since the September 2013 amendment of the Enforcement Order of the School Education Act (学校教育法施行令), how is school placement decided for children with disabilities?

  1. A child whose disability meets the degree in Article 22-3 of the Order attends a special needs school in principle
  2. Needs and the opinions of parents and experts are weighed comprehensively, and the municipal board of education makes the final decision
  3. The child always attends the school the parents choose, and the board of education plays no part in the decision
  4. The principal of the expected elementary school decides alone, without hearing the parents
AnswerB. Needs and the opinions of parents and experts are weighed comprehensively, and the municipal board of education makes the final decision

According to the MEXT guide, the 2013 amendment replaced uniform placement based on the degree of disability (meeting the criteria meant a special needs school in principle) with individual decisions that weigh educational needs, school and local conditions, and the opinions of parents and experts. The wishes of the child and parents are respected as far as possible, but the municipal board of education makes the final decision. Parents' choice is not automatically final, and the principal does not decide alone.

Q22 | Learning together under the Basic Act

Which statement matches Article 16 of the Basic Act for Persons with Disabilities (障害者基本法)?

  1. Ensure, as far as possible, that children can learn together, and actively promote exchange and joint learning
  2. Children with disabilities are, in principle, to be educated at special needs schools
  3. Exchange and joint learning must not be held without the consent of all parents
  4. The content of education is decided by the board of education alone, regardless of the wishes of the child and parents
AnswerA. Ensure, as far as possible, that children can learn together, and actively promote exchange and joint learning

Article 16 requires national and local governments to improve education while ensuring, as far as possible, that children with disabilities can learn together with children without disabilities (paragraph 1); to give sufficient information to children and parents and respect their wishes as far as possible (paragraph 2); and to actively promote exchange and joint learning (paragraph 3). There is no "special needs schools in principle" rule, no consent requirement for exchange, and no rule that wishes can be ignored.

Q23 | Basic staffing numbers

Under Article 7(1) of the Act on the Standards for Class Formation and Fixed Number of School Personnel of Public Compulsory Education Schools (義務標準法), which pair of numbers is used to calculate teacher allocations in public elementary and lower secondary schools?

  1. One teacher per 18 students for disability-related instruction and one per 13 for Japanese-language instruction
  2. One teacher per 8 students for both disability-related and Japanese-language instruction
  3. One teacher per 13 students for disability-related instruction and one per 18 for Japanese-language instruction
  4. One teacher per 35 students for both disability-related and Japanese-language instruction
AnswerC. One teacher per 13 students for disability-related instruction and one per 18 for Japanese-language instruction

Article 7(1)(v) multiplies the number of students receiving special instruction for disabilities (resource-room instruction) by 1/13, and item (vi) multiplies the number receiving special instruction according to their ability to understand and use Japanese by 1/18. Swapping 13 and 18 is wrong. Eight is the standard size of a special needs class and 35 the standard for single-grade classes; neither is used here.

Q24 | Special curriculum for Japanese-language instruction

Which statement about Japanese-language instruction under the "special curriculum" (特別の教育課程) is correct?

  1. It is set up only for lower secondary schools and cannot be used in elementary schools
  2. The standard is 35 to 280 unit hours a year, the same as resource-room instruction for disabilities
  3. It is limited to the Japanese language itself and cannot deal with subject content
  4. Article 56-2 of the Enforcement Regulations also applies to lower secondary schools, and the standard is 10 to 280 unit hours a year
AnswerD. Article 56-2 of the Enforcement Regulations also applies to lower secondary schools, and the standard is 10 to 280 unit hours a year

Article 56-2 of the Enforcement Regulations (学校教育法施行規則) allows elementary schools to use a special curriculum for children not proficient in Japanese, and Article 79 applies it to lower secondary schools. The January 2014 MEXT notice and public notice set the standard at 10 to 280 unit hours a year and include subject instruction suited to the child's Japanese ability, not just Japanese itself. It is not limited to lower secondary schools. 35 to 280 is the standard for resource-room instruction for disabilities (other than learning disabilities and ADHD).

Q25 | Who receives Japanese-language instruction and how

Which statement matches the January 2014 MEXT notice on Japanese-language instruction under the "special curriculum" (特別の教育課程)?

  1. Only foreign national students are eligible; Japanese nationals are not
  2. The instruction must always take place at another school and cannot be given at the home school
  3. Returnees and Japanese nationals can also be eligible, and the principal decides eligibility
  4. The instruction is to be given only by local volunteers without teaching licenses
AnswerC. Returnees and Japanese nationals can also be eligible, and the principal decides eligibility

The notice covers students whose Japanese is not sufficient for school life and understanding classes, including returnees from abroad, foreign national students, and children who speak a foreign language at home; the principal decides eligibility. Instruction is in principle given at the home school, with another school allowed when that is difficult. It is led by a licensed teacher in charge of Japanese instruction, with assistants added as needed.

Q26 | The FY2025 survey

Which statement matches the results of MEXT's Survey on the Acceptance of Students Requiring Japanese-Language Instruction (日本語指導が必要な児童生徒の受入状況等に関する調査) for FY2025 (as of May 1, 2025)?

  1. The number fell from the previous survey to below 50,000 in total
  2. All such students were foreign nationals; there were no Japanese nationals
  3. Among foreign nationals, English was the most common language, followed by Spanish
  4. 84,759 students, an increase from the previous survey; Chinese was the most common language among foreign nationals
AnswerD. 84,759 students, an increase from the previous survey; Chinese was the most common language among foreign nationals

The summary reports 84,759 public school students requiring Japanese-language instruction, up 15,636 (22.6%) from the previous survey: 73,313 foreign nationals and 11,446 Japanese nationals. Among foreign nationals, Chinese (24.3%) was the most common language, followed by Portuguese (16.3%). A decrease, zero Japanese nationals, or English as the top language all contradict the results.

Q27 | Schooling of foreign children

Which statement matches MEXT's guidelines on the school attendance of foreign children (revised August 2026)?

  1. Parents have no duty under the School Education Act to send the child to school, but they must be informed that the child can enter a public compulsory education school
  2. Parents of foreign children have the same duty under the School Education Act as Japanese parents
  3. Foreign children cannot enter public elementary or lower secondary schools and are to attend foreign schools
  4. Municipalities must not check the school attendance of foreign children, to protect personal information
AnswerA. Parents have no duty under the School Education Act to send the child to school, but they must be informed that the child can enter a public compulsory education school

The guidelines state that parents of school-age foreign children are not subject to the attendance duty in Article 16 of the School Education Act (学校教育法), and that, in light of the International Covenants on Human Rights and the Convention on the Rights of the Child, they must be told that their child can enter a public compulsory education school. The August 2026 revision and notice also call for thorough school guidance and individual checks by phone or visit. Personal information must be handled properly, but checking attendance is encouraged, not forbidden.

Q28 | People past school age and lower secondary school

Which statement matches what the August 2026 MEXT notice "On Promoting School Enrollment of Foreign Students" (外国人児童生徒等の就学の促進について) says about people past school age?

  1. The notice says they are prohibited by law from entering public lower secondary schools
  2. They can be accepted at public lower secondary schools, and care should be taken to inform them about night junior high schools
  3. The notice says they must always start again from the first grade of elementary school
  4. Night junior high schools accept only Japanese nationals, so foreigners are not informed about them
AnswerB. They can be accepted at public lower secondary schools, and care should be taken to inform them about night junior high schools

The notice states that people who passed school age without completing compulsory education for various reasons can be accepted at public lower secondary schools, and asks local governments that run night junior high schools (夜間中学) to take care to guide them there. There is no prohibition, no rule to restart from first grade, and no exclusion of foreigners. This point is specific to the lower secondary level.

Q29 | General Provisions on returnees and Japanese instruction

Which statement matches Section 4-2(2) of Chapter 1 (General Provisions) of the Elementary and Lower Secondary School Courses of Study (学習指導要領)?

  1. For returnees, schools help them adapt to school life and give guidance that makes use of their experience abroad
  2. For returnees, schools avoid their experience abroad and guide them to fit Japanese life quickly
  3. Resource-room Japanese instruction is given by the teacher in charge alone, with no call to cooperate with the homeroom teacher
  4. It is enough to prepare one teaching plan for the whole class for children who have difficulty acquiring Japanese
AnswerA. For returnees, schools help them adapt to school life and give guidance that makes use of their experience abroad

The General Provisions say schools should help returnees adapt to school life and give appropriate guidance, such as making use of their experience of living abroad. For children who have difficulty acquiring Japanese, schools plan teaching content and methods systematically; for resource-room Japanese instruction in particular, teachers should cooperate and prepare plans individually. Ignoring their experience, skipping cooperation, or one plan for the whole class all contradict the text. The provision is the same for elementary and lower secondary schools.

Q30 | Diverse backgrounds and student guidance

Which statement matches what the Student Guidance Manual (生徒指導提要, December 2022) says about foreign students and others?

  1. "Foreign students and others" means only foreign nationals and excludes returnees and children of international marriages
  2. Language differences resolve themselves over time, so schools need not consider special support
  3. Complex difficulties can lead to school refusal and similar problems, and schools should identify needs and connect children to support
  4. Interpreting for parents is a family matter, so schools are not to get involved
AnswerC. Complex difficulties can lead to school refusal and similar problems, and schools should identify needs and connect children to support

Section 13.4.7 notes the growing number of children with diverse cultural and linguistic backgrounds, including returnees and children of international marriages as well as foreign nationals, and says complex difficulties from cultural and language differences can lead to school refusal, bullying, or dropping out. For children in a "young carer" situation, such as interpreting for parents or caring for family, schools should actively identify needs and connect them to support.

Practice: answer the questions on this page

This practice tool asks questions in random order (it works when JavaScript is enabled). You can still read all the questions and explanations above without it.

* The explanations are for study purposes. Always check the official guidelines of the local government whose exam you take. All questions are original. Laws are as of October 2026.

This page is a translation of the Japanese original. If the translation and the original differ, the Japanese version takes precedence. This translation was made with AI and may contain errors. Report a translation error View the Japanese original